⚖️ Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper: Annulment & Enforcement of Laudos

Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper extracts court rulings on the annulment and enforcement of arbitral awards (laudos arbitrales) from the official Poder Judicial de Peru portal. Each row has the case number, official resolution type, a plain outcome, the annulment grounds named in the ruling, cited articles of the Arbitration Law, the summary and the PDF link. Optional full text, statistics and an opt-in monitor mode that returns only rulings you have not seen in earlier runs. No login or API key. Export CSV, Excel, JSON or XML.

The Poder Judicial portal "Buscador de Resoluciones sobre Anulación y Ejecución de Laudos Arbitrales" lists 6,008 rulings from 2014 to 2026 (counter read on 2026-10-06), 10 per page and with no export. This Actor adds what the portal does not give you: derived outcomes, annulment grounds (Article 63.1 of the Arbitration Law), cited articles, date windows, signed PDF text and statistics such as the annulment success rate per year.

📋 What does the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper do?

• Full-content search in Spanish, with and without accents; each term runs as its own search and results are merged and de-duplicated.
• 15 ready-made topics such as due process, public procurement, construction, foreign awards and enforcement.
• Filters by year, subject, chamber, resolution type, outcome, annulment ground, keywords, case number and date range.
• Derived fields: outcome, annulmentGrounds (letters a to g of Article 63.1) and arbitrationLawArticles.
• Full text and PDFs (optional), including parties and the original file.
• Statistics mode: counts grouped by year, subject, chamber, outcome or ground (for example the annulment success rate per year).
• Monitor mode (onlyNew): only rulings you have not seen in earlier runs.

📊 What data can you extract from Peruvian arbitration rulings?

Field	Description
🧾 recordType	ruling or statistic
🆔 resolutionId	Portal UUID (also the PDF key)
📌 caseNumber, caseType	Case number and type (Demanda, Apelación, Inhibición...)
📄 resolutionType	Official type, for example "Sentencia infundada"
🏁 outcome	Derived: claim-granted, claim-dismissed, partially-granted, claim-inadmissible, confirmed-on-appeal, reversed-on-appeal, other
🧾 subject	Official subject (ANULACION DE LAUDOS ARBITRALES, EJECUCION DE LAUDOS ARBITRALES...)
🏢 chamber	Sala that issued the ruling
📅 resolutionDate, resolutionYear	ISO date and year
📝 summary, 🏷 keywords	Official summary and keywords
🔖 annulmentGrounds	Letters a to g of Article 63.1 named in the summary or keywords
📚 arbitrationLawArticles	Articles cited next to "Ley de Arbitraje" or "Decreto Legislativo 1071"
📎 pdfUrl	Official PDF link
📜 fullText, textChars, pdfPages, pdfSizeKb, captionFields, parties, 💾 pdfFileUrl	Added when full text or PDF saving is on
🔢 caseSequence, caseYear, courtCode, instanceCode, specialtyCode, unitNumber, incidentCode, matchedQuery	Parts of the case number, and the query that found the row
🕒 scrapedAt, error	Timestamp; error appears only on error rows (never charged) and holds the message

annulmentGrounds and arbitrationLawArticles are optional columns: they appear only on rulings whose official summary or keywords name a ground or cite an article, and are omitted otherwise (no empty arrays). A missing column means "not stated", not "no ground".

🧪 Sample output: annulment ruling

Real row from a cloud run on 2026-10-07:

{
  "recordType": "ruling",
  "resolutionId": "2640217c-a1dd-4fed-96bd-69d8c5793cfb",
  "caseNumber": "00164-2026-0-1866-SP-CO-01",
  "caseType": "Demanda",
  "resolutionType": "Sentencia infundada",
  "outcome": "claim-dismissed",
  "subject": "ANULACION DE LAUDOS ARBITRALES",
  "chamber": "1° SALA COMERCIAL",
  "resolutionDate": "2026-09-25",
  "resolutionYear": 2026,
  "summary": "ES INFUNDADO EL RECURSO DE ANULACIÓN SUSTENTADO EN LAS CAUSALES B) Y F) DEL ARTÍCULO 63 DE LA LEY DE ARBITRAJE ...",
  "keywords": ["VALORACIÓN PROBATORIA", "VICIO DE MOTIVACION"],
  "annulmentGrounds": ["b", "f"],
  "arbitrationLawArticles": [63],
  "pdfUrl": "https://jurisprudencia.pj.gob.pe/jurisprudenciaweb/ServletDescarga?uuid=2640217c-a1dd-4fed-96bd-69d8c5793cfb",
  "scrapedAt": "2026-10-07T19:32:21.719Z"
}

With full text on, the same ruling adds textChars, pdfPages, parties and the stored PDF link.

📈 Sample output: statistics row

Statistics mode on the 436 annulment rulings of 2023, grouped by outcome (cloud run, 232 seconds):

{ "recordType": "statistic", "groupedBy": "outcome", "outcome": "claim-dismissed", "count": 359, "shareOfRulings": 0.8234, "rulingsCounted": 436 }

The same run returned 48 granted (11.0%), 20 inadmissible (4.6%) and 9 partially granted (2.1%) rulings.

💰 How much does it cost to scrape Peruvian arbitration rulings?

Pay per event, no subscription. Error rows, empty searches and failed runs are never charged.

Event	What you get	Price (FREE plan)
ruling-record	One ruling with all metadata fields	$0.01 (Apify paid plans from $0.007735)
ruling-fulltext	Full text of the PDF, only when it has a text layer	$0.03
ruling-pdf-file	The original PDF saved in the key-value store	$0.015
statistics-record	One aggregated statistic row	$0.015

Worked example at FREE-plan prices: 10 rulings without PDFs cost $0.10 (10 ruling-record events), so 1,000 rulings cost 1,000 x $0.01 = $10.00. A ruling with text and saved PDF costs $0.055, so 1,000 of them cost $55.00. Set a maximum charge per run and the Actor stops cleanly at that limit. Free Apify accounts get a 10-item preview per run.

🚀 How do I scrape Peru arbitration rulings in 3 steps?

1. Open the Input tab, pick a topic or type Spanish search terms, and set filters such as year, outcome or annulment ground.
2. Optional: switch on Add full text of each ruling, Save the original PDFs or the Statistics mode.
3. Click Run and download CSV, Excel, JSON or XML.

Example input:

{ "searchTexts": ["anulación de laudo"], "subjects": ["ANULACION DE LAUDOS ARBITRALES"], "maxItems": 10 }

🔔 Only new rulings (monitor mode)

Turn on onlyNew and the Actor skips every ruling this same search already returned in an earlier run, so a scheduled run delivers just what is new. Skipped rulings are not charged. Use stateKey for separate monitors and resetSeen to start over.

• The seen list lives in a named key-value store, peru-laudos-seen, in your own Apify account.
• A search is identified by its terms, filters, date range and stateKey. Changing maxItems or the full text options keeps the same monitor; changing a term, filter or date starts a new one.
• maxItems means "up to N new rulings". A ruling is marked as seen only after it was saved and charged.
• Statistics mode ignores onlyNew. The list keeps the 200,000 most recent ids per monitor.

Measured on 2026-10-07 with maxItems: 3: the first run delivered 3 rulings, the second the next 3, and a run on an already delivered window charged nothing.

Example input for a weekly monitor:

{
  "subjects": ["ANULACION DE LAUDOS ARBITRALES"],
  "onlyNew": true,
  "maxItems": 100,
  "stateKey": "annulments-weekly"
}

Attach this input to a schedule and add a webhook on "Run succeeded" to send new rows to Slack, email or Google Sheets. Runs with zero new rulings cost nothing.

⚙️ Input parameters

Parameter	Meaning
searchTexts, topics, includeAccentVariants	Full-text search terms, ready-made topics, search with and without accents (default on)
years, subjects, chambers, resolutionTypes, outcomes, annulmentGrounds, keywords, summaryContains, caseNumbers, dateFrom, dateTo	Filters
sortBy, sortDirection, maxItems	Order (default newest first) and limit (default 10)
includePdfText, savePdfFiles, maxTextChars	Full text, saved PDFs, text length cap (default 300,000 characters)
onlyNew, stateKey, resetSeen	Monitor mode: return only rulings not delivered by an earlier run of the same search (default off), a monitor name, and a reset switch
mode, statisticsBy	rulings (default) or statistics, and the grouping dimensions
concurrency, proxyConfiguration	Parallel portal sessions (default 3) and proxy (default Apify Residential, Peru)

📤 Output and speed: how long does a run take?

Measured on 2026-10-06 in the cloud: 10 rulings with metadata only took 52 s, 3 rulings with full text and saved PDFs took 29 s, and statistics on the 436 rulings of 2023 took 232 s. Full-corpus statistics read every matching ruling, so plan for minutes to tens of minutes. Free accounts compute statistics on the first 200 matching rulings only.

🆚 How does it compare with other ways to get this data?

Compared with the portal by hand (10 rows per page, no export) or a generic web scraper, this Actor gives parallel reads, export, derived outcome and ground fields, full text and yearly statistics.

A search of the Apify Store on 2026-10-06 for "laudos arbitrales", "peru court rulings" and "peru poder judicial" found no other Actor for this portal. For price context, case-law Actors for other countries charge from $0.001 to $0.021 per record (Store, 2026-10-06), so $0.01 per ruling sits in the middle; full text is priced higher because rulings are long documents.

💼 What can you do with arbitration ruling data?

• Annulment strategy: list every ruling where ground b (right of defense) annulled an award, by chamber and year.
• Public procurement: measure how often awards involving state entities are annulled.
• Enforcement risk: pull enforcement rulings for a counterparty.
• Legal AI and research: build a corpus of Peruvian arbitration case law with full text.

🔌 How do I call it from the API or automate it?

Schedule runs with onlyNew: true, then send the dataset to Make, Zapier, n8n, Slack, Airbyte or Google Sheets.

curl -X POST "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/recordsdata~peru-laudos-arbitrales-scraper/run-sync-get-dataset-items?token=<YOUR_APIFY_TOKEN>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"subjects":["ANULACION DE LAUDOS ARBITRALES"],"maxItems":50}'

⚖️ Is it legal to scrape Peruvian court rulings?

The Actor collects only what the official Poder Judicial portal shows publicly to any visitor, with no login and no access control bypassed. Rulings can contain personal data of parties and lawyers, so you are responsible for complying with Peru's Ley 29733 and the portal's terms of use. Party names are returned only when the PDF has labeled caption lines. This is not legal advice. The Actor is independent and not affiliated with the Poder Judicial del Peru.

🤖 Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper MCP server for AI agents

AI agents can call this Actor through the Apify MCP server at https://mcp.apify.com?tools=RecordsData/peru-laudos-arbitrales-scraper. The URL loads only this Actor as a tool.

Add this to your MCP client configuration (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apify": {
      "url": "https://mcp.apify.com?tools=RecordsData/peru-laudos-arbitrales-scraper"
    }
  }
}

Example agent prompt:

Use the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper to get the 50 most recent annulment rulings that granted the claim on ground b (right of defense), and summarize which chambers issued them.

An agent should choose this tool when it needs structured Peruvian case law on the annulment or enforcement of arbitral awards (outcomes, grounds, cited articles, full text or yearly statistics). The tool takes the same fields as the Input parameters table above.

❓ Frequently asked questions

How many Peru arbitration rulings does the scraper cover?

The Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper covers 6,008 rulings from 2014 to 2026 on the Poder Judicial portal (counter read on 2026-10-06). The 2026-10-04 scan found 4,503 annulment cases, 685 obligations, 564 enforcement of guarantees, 218 enforcement of awards and 10 foreign award recognitions (exequatur).

What does the outcome field mean in the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper?

The outcome field is derived from the official resolution type: "Sentencia infundada" is claim-dismissed, "Sentencia fundada" is claim-granted, "fundada en parte" is partially-granted, "improcedente" is claim-inadmissible, and appeal orders map to confirmed-on-appeal or reversed-on-appeal. A bare "Sentencia" (1,571 rulings) is other, because the Poder Judicial portal does not state the result.

How does the scraper find annulment grounds in Peruvian rulings?

The Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper reads explicit mentions such as "causal b)", "CAUSALES B Y C" or "literales b) y c)" in each ruling's summary and keywords, and maps them to letters a to g of Article 63.1 of the Arbitration Law. 2,987 of the 4,503 annulment rulings name at least one ground. If none is stated, the column is omitted.

Why does the Peru arbitration rulings scraper search with and without accents?

The Poder Judicial portal is accent-sensitive and often indexes words only without accents: "corrupción" finds nothing while "corrupcion" finds thousands. The Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper therefore runs both spellings by default through includeAccentVariants, merges the results and de-duplicates them by resolution id, so a Spanish keyword search does not silently miss rulings.

How do the date filters work in the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper?

The Poder Judicial portal has no date filter of its own. With the default newest-first date sort, the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper uses dateFrom and dateTo and locates the right result pages with a binary search, then reads only those pages.

Why does the scraper use a Peruvian residential proxy?

The Poder Judicial portal answers HTTP 403 to datacenter IP addresses, so the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper defaults to Apify Residential proxies located in Peru, so you do not need to configure anything or supply your own proxy settings, and datacenter proxies are not needed.

Why did my Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper run return 0 results?

The search matched nothing on the Poder Judicial portal. The run ends as succeeded with the message "no items matched the input" and charges nothing. Try fewer filters, keep accent variants on, or use a single Spanish keyword, because all words of one term must appear in the same ruling.

What happens if the Poder Judicial portal is down or blocks the run?

If the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper could not read any ruling because the Poder Judicial portal is down or blocks the request, the run fails with a clear error message instead of ending as a silent empty success. Nothing is charged for a failed run or for error rows, so you can simply retry later.

Does the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper return the full text of rulings?

Yes. Switch on "Add full text of each ruling" and the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper extracts the text of each signed PDF, with page count, caption lines and parties. Scanned PDFs without a text layer return a notice and the $0.03 ruling-fulltext event is not charged.

How do I get only new Peru arbitration rulings since my last run?

Set onlyNew to true and schedule the Peru Arbitration Rulings Scraper. Each run returns only rulings that the same search has not returned before, and skipped rulings are free. Use stateKey for separate monitors and resetSeen to start over from zero.

🔗 Want more legal and public-records data?

• Peru Jurisprudencia Scraper for the Supreme and Superior Court rulings of Peru.
• DataJud Scraper for Brazilian court cases across 91 courts.
• SECOP Colombia Procurement Scraper for Colombian public procurement.

🆘 Support

Write to contact.punkrecordsdata@gmail.com.

Last updated: 2026-10-11