Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol
Timothy Kelvin
Downloads of tokio, async-std and smol on crates.io over the last 30 days, each compared with the 30 days before, with the percentage change.
Input
Output fields
Sign up on Apify or log in
The Crates.io Download Stats: Rust Crate Trends Actor is ready to run with the inputs already set for "Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol". Sign up or log in and you'll land in Apify Console with a copy of this exact task.
Start the "Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol" task
The Crates.io Download Stats: Rust Crate Trends Actor will start running based on the input automatically. You can also change all the input fields, like crates and period length (days), to match your specific use case.
Receive the "Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol" output
Monitor the progress in real time. You will be notified as soon as your dataset is complete and ready for review. Each result includes data such as crate, current period downloads, current period start, and more.
Integrate into your workflow
The final output is delivered in JSON, CSV, or Excel format, ready to be plugged into your workflow. You can also run the "Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol" task via API.

Integrate "Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol" into your workflow
Connect "Rust async runtimes compared: tokio vs async-std vs smol" with 100+ integrations, or run it via API or MCP.
Webhook
n8n
Make
Zapier
Airbyte
Keboola
IFTTT
Hubspot
GDrive
Gmail
Apify MCP
GitHub
Slack
LangChain
LlamaIndex
Flowise
Pinecone
OpenAI
Mastra
Clay