NIH RePORTER Scraper - Grants & Funded Projects
Pricing
from $2.00 / 1,000 results
NIH RePORTER Scraper - Grants & Funded Projects
Search public NIH RePORTER awards and export project abstracts, funding, organizations, dates, mechanisms, study sections, and source links.
Pricing
from $2.00 / 1,000 results
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
Thirdwatch
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
9 hours ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
NIH RePORTER Projects Scraper
Export structured public NIH RePORTER public funded-project records for discovery, comparison, monitoring, and governance.
What you get
Search the public NIH RePORTER catalog and save one deduplicated row per public funded-project record. Results include application and project IDs, titles, bounded abstracts, public-health relevance, award amounts, fiscal years, budget dates, mechanisms, agencies, funded organizations, study sections, and project links. Use discovery inputs for market maps and exact-name inputs, when available, for stable monitoring cohorts.
Output fields
| Field group | Description |
|---|---|
| Identity | Canonical applicationId, display name, and source URL. |
| Time evidence | Effective, filing, award, report, or catalog dates when published by the source. |
| Measures and status | Public amounts, counts, scores, or status evidence available from the source. |
| Ownership and links | Public organization, agency, product, committee, artist, or source references. |
| Classification | Public tags, categories, keywords, packaging, or status values. |
| Provenance | Search query and named upstream source for traceable analysis. |
Example output
{"applicationId":11212776,"projectNumber":"5I01BX005918-04","title":"Biomarker based classification","fiscalYear":2026,"awardAmount":994636,"organizationName":"VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM","sourceUrl":"https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/11212776"}
Input parameters
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
queries | No | Up to five title, abstract, and term searches. |
projectNumbers | No | Up to 25 exact project numbers. |
organizationNames | No | Optional organization filters. |
fiscalYearFrom | No | Inclusive first fiscal year. |
fiscalYearTo | No | Inclusive last fiscal year. |
maxResultsPerQuery | Yes | Maximum projects per query. |
maxResults | Yes | Maximum unique projects saved. |
At least one discovery or exact-name input is required. Result limits apply after cross-input deduplication, and only saved unique rows are charged.
Use cases
- Developers: discover alternatives and compare public release evidence.
- Platform teams: monitor versions, tags, compatibility, and activity for a fixed portfolio.
- Security teams: build an evidence inventory before joining vulnerability and deployment data.
- Product researchers: map a developer ecosystem with repeatable queries and dated snapshots.
Limitations
Search follows NIH indexing and award data can be amended. The Actor excludes investigator and program-officer details, exact coordinates, and postal identifiers; award records do not prove research outcomes.
Compared to alternatives
Current Apify Store alternatives include automation-lab/nih-reporter-scraper and dataforge/nih-grants-scraper. Thirdwatch combines discovery and bounded monitoring inputs where the source permits them, saves canonical evidence URLs, deduplicates before charging, provides exactly four PPE tiers, and ships ten ready-to-save Task recipes plus a five-article workflow library. Compare current Store listings directly because competitor features and pricing can change.
FAQ
Does this Actor access private packages or accounts?
No. It collects only metadata available from the public source and does not sign in, bypass access controls, or request private registry credentials.
How should I monitor a fixed portfolio?
Use exact names where supported, keep result limits explicit, save the input as an Apify Task, and retain dated datasets. Do not let an empty or failed run overwrite the previous successful snapshot.
Does a public record prove the final conclusion?
No. Public-source records are evidence for analysis, not the analysis itself. Keep provenance, apply documented rules separately, and require qualified review for high-stakes decisions.
Where can I find more workflows?
Visit Thirdwatch public-data scrapers and other Thirdwatch Actors, including GitHub, npm, and OSV Actors.
Last verified: 2026-07