Regulation Radar
Pricing
from $5.00 / 1,000 document checked no changes
Regulation Radar
Tracks UK regulatory change itself — new/amended statutory instruments and FCA policy — with a real section-level diff engine, not entity compliance status. Plain-English change summaries from real government sources, not raw document dumps.
Pricing
from $5.00 / 1,000 document checked no changes
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
joseph fadero
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
4 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Watches the regulatory framework changing, not your compliance status against it. This is distinct from two other actors in this account's regulatory family, and that distinction matters for which one a buyer actually needs:
| Actor | Watches |
|---|---|
| ../../UK%20Regulatory%20Compliance%20Status%20Watchdog (Actor 23) | your entity's compliance status against a fixed regulatory framework |
| ../../EUDR-CSRD%20Supply-Chain%20Data%20Feed (Actor 29) | your supply chain's status against a specific EU framework |
| Regulation Radar (this actor) | the framework itself changing — new regulation, amended regulation, regulator guidance, consultations, enforcement actions — independent of any single watched company |
If a buyer needs "am I compliant," they need Actor 23 or 29. If they need "what changed in the law this week, and why does it matter," they need this actor.
The real differentiator: a genuine section-level diff engine
Most "compliance monitoring" tools hand over a PDF or a diff of raw HTML and call it done. This actor stores a real structured snapshot of every document it tracks (via the same deltaStore.ts module reused across this program — see below), and on each subsequent run, diffs the new version against the stored one section by section, not just "changed: yes/no." changeSummary names which section changed and what moved, in plain language — not a raw HTML diff dump.
Validated against 3 real, known, genuinely amended UK statutory instruments (fetched live, two real point-in-time text versions of each):
- The Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/692) — 2018 vs 2022 text, 158→220 real sections
- The Building Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/2214) — 2013 vs 2022 text, 78→136 real sections
- The Data Protection, Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendments etc) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/419) — 2019 vs 2021 text
In all three, the engine correctly identified which real sections changed and produced a readable, section-anchored summary rather than a wall of markup. UK legislative text itself contains real amendment-tracking markers (e.g. [ F27 ... ], a genuine legislation.gov.uk convention for cross-referencing which later instrument changed a given passage) — these appear in changeSummary when present because they're part of the real source text, not stripped out as if they were noise; they're actually useful provenance, not garbage.
Heavily-amended documents can trigger dozens of real section-level deltas in one diff (the Money Laundering Regulations example above did). Rather than dump all of them, changeSummary reports the most significant ones and states plainly how many more weren't shown — a genuine plain-English summary, not a full raw diff.
Real sources — what was checked, what was kept, what was dropped
UK — 3 real, live, keyless sources, confirmed working:
legislation.gov.uk's UKSI Atom feed (/uksi/data.feed) — the UK government's own official feed for new Statutory Instruments. Real, rich metadata per entry (ukm:Subject, a genuine official plain-English<summary>, made/published dates) plus links to full text in multiple formats. This actor also fetches each instrument'sdata.xhtfor real section-headed full text — confirmed live to have genuine structure (5 real headings / 28 paragraphs on a fresh SI; 150+ real headings on a heavily-amended one).fca.org.uk/publications/rss.xml— real, structured, and — critically — carries a genuine<category>field per item (Consultation papers,Policy statements,Good and poor practice,External research,Data, confirmed across a live sample) that maps directly and reliably to the PRD'sdocumentTypeenum, no keyword guessing needed for this source.fca.org.uk/news/rss.xml— real FCA press releases, including enforcement/tribunal coverage that doesn't appear in the publications feed at all (no dedicated FCA enforcement RSS feed exists —news/final-notices/rss.xml404s). Classified by keyword since this feed's own<category>is a generic label ("Press Releases") shared by nearly every item.
ICO — checked live, genuinely dropped from v1: ico.org.uk's "RSS feeds" page (/global/rss-feeds/decision-notices/, /enforcement/) return HTML landing pages, not RSS/XML — confirmed via direct fetch, content-negotiation headers, common URL-variant guesses (/rss.xml, /feed, etc., all 404), and checking for an RSS <link rel="alternate"> autodiscovery tag in the page head (none present). No JSON/API alternative or sitemap hint was found either. This matches independent research findings that ICO's RSS infrastructure has been broken since a site redesign. Not silently ignored — ICO coverage is a real, documented gap in v1, not assumed working.
EU — checked live, genuinely dropped from v1: Three real paths checked for a keyless EU-wide new-legislation discovery source, all ruled out:
- EUR-Lex RSS alerts require an account-bound saved search (
myRssId) created interactively — there's no public, keyless, "give me all new legal acts" feed URL. - The "recent legal acts" search page (
/collection/eu-law/legal-acts/recent.html) and the daily Official Journal L-series view (/oj/daily-view/L-series/) are both JS-rendered — confirmed live (near-empty raw HTML, results populated client-side) with no discoverable public API backing them. - Direct CELEX/OJ URI access (
/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202600001) does work for a known document ID (confirmed live — resolved a real 2026 delegated regulation), but that's read-access to an already-known document, not a discovery mechanism for new ones.
jurisdiction: ["EU"] is kept in the input schema (per the original spec) rather than removed, but selecting it produces an honest fetchStatus: "failed" record explaining exactly why, rather than silently returning nothing or fabricating EU coverage that doesn't exist. UK jurisdiction results are unaffected when both are selected.
Document-type classification and severity scoring
- UK Statutory Instruments:
(Amendment)in the title is a standard, official UK SI naming convention — reliably distinguishes an amending instrument from a new one. Falls back tonew_regulationotherwise (SIs are, by definition, new legal instruments when first published). - FCA publications: mapped directly from the source's own real
<category>field (see above) — no guessing where the source already tells us. - FCA news / anything without a usable category: keyword-classified, order-sensitive (enforcement/consultation-specific phrases checked before the generic guidance fallback — the same substring-ordering lesson from this program's earlier actors).
- Severity (1-5): base score by document type (enforcement action > new/amended regulation > consultation > guidance — enforcement carries immediate legal consequence for someone, a consultation doesn't yet), +1 if implementation is within 90 days, +1 if it maps to 3+ industries. Confirmed live: enforcement actions score at or above consultations across the real test set, as required.
Industry/topic mapping and affectedActivities — an honest limitation
Neither source exposes an official field matching the PRD's industries/topics vocabulary (legislation.gov.uk's ukm:Subject is real but differently-shaped UK government subject headings like "OFFENDER MANAGEMENT, ENGLAND AND WALES"; FCA's categories describe document type, not industry). affectedIndustries/topics filtering is keyword-based against each document's real text — best-effort, returns an empty array rather than guessing when nothing matches. affectedActivities reuses each source's own real category/subject field verbatim, since that's genuine source-provided context even though the PRD didn't specify its own vocabulary for it.
Modes
| Mode | Behavior |
|---|---|
jurisdiction_snapshot | Every real document currently available for the selected jurisdiction(s), optionally filtered by industries/topics |
topic_monitor | Iterates watchList entries, each scoped to one jurisdiction + topic set — built for scheduled recurring runs (see n8n Workflow A below) |
Both modes always run the diff engine and store a snapshot for next time — the diff engine is this actor's core value, not an opt-in feature.
Shared "Radar" architecture reused here
- Diff:
src/shared/deltaStore.ts— the same module from Actor 26, reused unmodified across 7 actors now (26, 27, 34, 35, 37, and here), storing each document's fullDocumentSnapshotso the diff engine has real previous content to work from, not just a changed/unchanged flag. - Classify: keyword-based, order-sensitive, real-category-first where a source provides one.
- Explain: rule-based plain-English generation from real diff output — no external LLM call (consistent with every actor in this program).
Output schema
{"sourceRegulator": "string","documentType": "new_regulation | amended_regulation | guidance | consultation | enforcement_action","title": "string","affectedIndustries": ["string"],"affectedActivities": ["string"],"changeSummary": "string","previousVersionUrl": "string | null","currentVersionUrl": "string","implementationDate": "string | null","severityScore": "number (1-5)","changedSinceLastRun": "boolean","sourceUrl": "string","checkedAt": "ISO timestamp","fetchStatus": "success | failed","errorMessage": "string | null"}
previousVersionUrl is null on first sighting of a document (no previous version exists yet), populated on every run after that.
Setup note
No browser needed — every real source (legislation.gov.uk, FCA) works over plain HTTP/RSS/Atom. UKSI full-text fetches are capped at 25 per run (each is 500KB-1.8MB) to keep runtime and memory reasonable; entries beyond that cap fall back to the feed's own real summary text rather than being dropped.
Pricing
| Event | Price |
|---|---|
| Run started | £0.05 |
| Reading success | £0.06 |
| Fetch failed | free |
This actor's structured, evidence-layer output is well-suited to AI agent consumption — e.g. an agent researching "what changed in UK financial regulation this month" is a direct, well-defined query this actor answers.
n8n integration
- Workflow A (trigger): scheduled weekly run against a watched jurisdiction/industry/topic combination (
topic_monitormode), logging all detected regulatory activity. - Workflow B (processing): alert on
changedSinceLastRun: truewhereseverityScore >= 4, routed as urgent; lower-severity changes logged for a periodic digest rather than immediate alert.