DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker — Protocol Revenue vs User Fees
Pricing
Pay per usage
DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker — Protocol Revenue vs User Fees
Ranks 2,000+ DeFi protocols by 24h fees and developer revenue using DefiLlama. Shows revenue margin (how much developers keep vs users pay). No API key. $0.005/run.
What does DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker do?
DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker fetches fee and revenue data for 2,000+ DeFi protocols from DefiLlama and produces three ranked lists — top protocols by 24h DeFi fees, top by protocol revenue, and highest revenue margin — plus a suite of 30+ computed analytics fields covering growth signals, competitive moat, token value accrual, protocol profitability, fee model sustainability, and valuation vs peers. It is the most complete DeFi protocol profitability and fee revenue ranking tool on the Apify Store, and it requires no API key.
Why use DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker?
- Full DeFi fee economy snapshot: Covers 2,000+ protocols tracked by DefiLlama in a single $0.005 run — including DEXes, lending protocols, perpetuals, liquid staking, bridges, and RWA protocols. The summary record reports total market 24h fees, total revenue, and overall margin across the entire DeFi fee economy.
- Competitive moat and category ranking:
competitive_moatclassifies each protocol asdominant(>50% category fee share),strong,competing,niche, orlosing_groundwithin its DeFi category.sector_rank_in_categorygives a precise rank (top_earner,top_3,top_10,below_top_10) against all peers. - Protocol profitability and sustainability:
protocol_profitabilityclassifies protocols ashighly_profitable,profitable,break_even,subsidized, orunsustainablebased on the revenue/fees ratio.fee_model_sustainabilityseparates real-fee earners from inflation-subsidy protocols andponzi_riskcases. - Token value accrual:
token_value_accrualclassifies how fees benefit token holders:direct_fee_sharing,buyback,treasury_only, orno_accrual— critical for evaluating real yield vs governance token narratives. - Valuation vs peers:
valuation_vs_peersranks each protocol's price-to-fees ratio (P/F — the DeFi equivalent of P/E) in percentile terms against all other protocols:deeply_undervalued,undervalued,fair,overvalued, orextremely_overvalued.
How to use DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker
- Go to the Apify Store and find DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker.
- Click Try for free to open the actor in Apify Console.
- In the Input tab, set
topN(results per ranked list) and optionally filter bycategory(e.g.DEX,Lending,Derivatives). - Click Start — the full run completes in under 30 seconds.
- Explore the three typed list outputs (
top_fees_24h,top_revenue_24h,highest_revenue_margin) plus the summary record in the Dataset tab. - Export to JSON/CSV and join against your portfolio watchlist or valuation models.
Input
| Field | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
topN | integer | 30 | Number of results per ranked list (top_fees, top_revenue, highest_margin) |
category | string | (all) | Filter by DefiLlama category: DEX, Lending, CDP, Derivatives, Perpetuals, Liquid Staking, Bridge, Options, NFT Marketplace, RWA |
Output
[{"type": "summary","protocols_with_fees_24h": 1847,"total_fees_24h": 18400000,"total_revenue_24h": 6200000,"overall_margin_pct": 33.7,"defi_fee_growth_trend": "sector_expanding","avg_price_to_fees_ratio": 42.8,"fetched_at": "2026-09-02T08:22:00Z"},{"list_type": "top_fees_24h","rank": 1,"name": "Uniswap","slug": "uniswap","category": "Dexes","chains": ["ethereum", "arbitrum", "polygon", "optimism", "base"],"fees_24h": 2840000,"fees_7d": 19100000,"fees_30d": 78400000,"revenue_24h": 0,"revenue_margin_pct": 0.0,"protocol_profitability": "unsustainable","fee_growth_momentum": "stable","competitive_moat": "dominant","token_value_accrual": "buyback","fee_model_sustainability": "sustainable","valuation_vs_peers": "overvalued","revenue_quality_score": 0,"protocol_growth_signal": "stable","macro_demand_sensitivity": "cyclical","fee_dominance_tier": "top10pct","sector_rank_in_category": "top_earner","sustainability_score": 38,"revenue_diversification": "multi_chain","price_to_fees_ratio": 18.4,"fetched_at": "2026-09-02T08:22:00Z"}]
Data fields
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
name | Protocol display name |
slug | DefiLlama protocol identifier |
category | Protocol category (DEX, Lending, Derivatives, etc.) |
chains | Blockchain networks where the protocol is deployed |
fees_24h | Total fees paid by users in last 24h (USD) |
fees_7d | Total fees over the last 7 days (USD) |
fees_30d | Total fees over the last 30 days (USD) |
revenue_24h | Fees retained by the protocol/developers in last 24h (USD) |
revenue_margin_pct | Revenue as % of fees (the protocol's take rate / "spread") |
fee_growth_momentum | explosive, strong, growing, stable, declining, or collapsing |
protocol_profitability | highly_profitable, profitable, break_even, subsidized, unsustainable |
revenue_trend | Recent fee trajectory: accelerating, stable, or declining |
competitive_moat | Category fee market share: dominant, strong, competing, niche, losing_ground |
sector_rank_in_category | Competitive position: top_earner, top_3, top_10, below_top_10 |
token_value_accrual | How fees reach token holders: direct_fee_sharing, buyback, treasury_only, no_accrual |
fee_model_sustainability | sustainable, hybrid, inflation_subsidy, or ponzi_risk |
valuation_vs_peers | P/F ratio percentile: deeply_undervalued, undervalued, fair, overvalued, extremely_overvalued |
price_to_fees_ratio | Market cap / annualized fees — DeFi equivalent of P/E ratio |
mcap_to_revenue_ratio | Market cap / annualized revenue (stricter P/E equivalent) |
sustainability_score | 0–100 composite: revenue margin + revenue trend + fee yield |
revenue_quality_score | 0–100 real yield quality: revenue/fees ratio (higher = less emissions-dependent) |
protocol_growth_signal | hypergrowth, growing, stable, declining, or dying |
macro_demand_sensitivity | cyclical (DEX/perps), defensive (lending/RWA), or counter_cyclical (options) |
fee_dominance_tier | Global fee ranking tier: top10pct, top25pct, top50pct, rest |
revenue_diversification | multi_chain, multi_product, single_product_single_chain, or concentrated_risk |
quarterly_fee_run_rate_usd | Annualized 30d fees / 4 — quarterly revenue equivalent |
revenue_per_chain_usd | Daily revenue divided by number of chains deployed |
fee_revenue_growth_rate_7d_pct | 7d daily average vs 30d daily average (positive = accelerating) |
ve_token_apy | Estimated ve-token staker APY for ve-model protocols (e.g. Curve, Velodrome) |
Cost estimation
Pricing: $0.005 flat per run — scans all 2,000+ DefiLlama protocols regardless of the topN filter.
| Scenario | Protocols Scanned | Estimated Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Single on-demand run | 2,000+ | $0.005 |
| Daily scheduled runs (30/month) | 2,000+ × 30 | $0.15/month |
| Hourly monitoring (720/month) | 2,000+ × 720 | $3.60/month |
FAQ
Q: Do I need a DefiLlama API key?
No. The actor queries the public DefiLlama fees API (api.llama.fi/overview/fees) which requires no authentication. Data is available for 2,000+ protocols across all major blockchains.
Q: What is the difference between fees_24h and revenue_24h?
fees_24h is the total amount paid by users to use the protocol — for a DEX this is the swap fee, for a lending protocol this is the interest spread. revenue_24h is the portion that the protocol itself retains (goes to the DAO treasury, developers, or token holders). The difference typically goes to liquidity providers. The revenue_margin_pct field expresses revenue as a percentage of fees — the protocol's effective take rate.
Q: How is valuation_vs_peers calculated?
It computes the price_to_fees_ratio (market cap divided by annualized fees) for every protocol in the run that has market cap data, then ranks the current protocol by percentile against all peers. A protocol in the bottom 20% of P/F ratios is labeled deeply_undervalued; the top 20% is extremely_overvalued. This is analogous to P/E screening in equity analysis.
Disclaimer: Fee and revenue data is sourced from DefiLlama and reflects on-chain activity as reported by each protocol. Valuation signals and growth labels are algorithmic computations and do not constitute investment advice. DeFi protocol revenue can change rapidly due to market conditions, governance decisions, and tokenomics changes.
Keywords: DeFi fee ranker, DeFi protocol revenue, DefiLlama fees, protocol profitability, DeFi earnings, fee revenue ratio, DeFi revenue ranking, on-chain fees, crypto protocol fees, DeFi analytics
Related actors
- Protocol Revenue Leaderboard — Complementary ranking focusing on cumulative all-time revenue alongside this actor's daily fee view
- DeFi TVL Velocity Ranker — TVL momentum to pair with fee revenue for identifying growing DeFi protocols
- Crypto Alpha Dashboard — Combined signal dashboard using fee revenue as one of several alpha factors
Feedback
If this actor powers your DeFi research, a review helps others find it: Leave a review on Apify Store