DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker — Protocol Revenue vs User Fees avatar

DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker — Protocol Revenue vs User Fees

Pricing

Pay per usage

Go to Apify Store
DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker — Protocol Revenue vs User Fees

DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker — Protocol Revenue vs User Fees

Ranks 2,000+ DeFi protocols by 24h fees and developer revenue using DefiLlama. Shows revenue margin (how much developers keep vs users pay). No API key. $0.005/run.

Pricing

Pay per usage

Rating

0.0

(0)

Developer

Hojun Lee

Hojun Lee

Maintained by Community

Actor stats

0

Bookmarked

2

Total users

1

Monthly active users

3 days ago

Last modified

Categories

Share

What does DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker do?

DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker fetches fee and revenue data for 2,000+ DeFi protocols from DefiLlama and produces three ranked lists — top protocols by 24h DeFi fees, top by protocol revenue, and highest revenue margin — plus a suite of 30+ computed analytics fields covering growth signals, competitive moat, token value accrual, protocol profitability, fee model sustainability, and valuation vs peers. It is the most complete DeFi protocol profitability and fee revenue ranking tool on the Apify Store, and it requires no API key.

Why use DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker?

  • Full DeFi fee economy snapshot: Covers 2,000+ protocols tracked by DefiLlama in a single $0.005 run — including DEXes, lending protocols, perpetuals, liquid staking, bridges, and RWA protocols. The summary record reports total market 24h fees, total revenue, and overall margin across the entire DeFi fee economy.
  • Competitive moat and category ranking: competitive_moat classifies each protocol as dominant (>50% category fee share), strong, competing, niche, or losing_ground within its DeFi category. sector_rank_in_category gives a precise rank (top_earner, top_3, top_10, below_top_10) against all peers.
  • Protocol profitability and sustainability: protocol_profitability classifies protocols as highly_profitable, profitable, break_even, subsidized, or unsustainable based on the revenue/fees ratio. fee_model_sustainability separates real-fee earners from inflation-subsidy protocols and ponzi_risk cases.
  • Token value accrual: token_value_accrual classifies how fees benefit token holders: direct_fee_sharing, buyback, treasury_only, or no_accrual — critical for evaluating real yield vs governance token narratives.
  • Valuation vs peers: valuation_vs_peers ranks each protocol's price-to-fees ratio (P/F — the DeFi equivalent of P/E) in percentile terms against all other protocols: deeply_undervalued, undervalued, fair, overvalued, or extremely_overvalued.

How to use DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker

  1. Go to the Apify Store and find DeFi Fee & Revenue Ranker.
  2. Click Try for free to open the actor in Apify Console.
  3. In the Input tab, set topN (results per ranked list) and optionally filter by category (e.g. DEX, Lending, Derivatives).
  4. Click Start — the full run completes in under 30 seconds.
  5. Explore the three typed list outputs (top_fees_24h, top_revenue_24h, highest_revenue_margin) plus the summary record in the Dataset tab.
  6. Export to JSON/CSV and join against your portfolio watchlist or valuation models.

Input

FieldTypeDefaultDescription
topNinteger30Number of results per ranked list (top_fees, top_revenue, highest_margin)
categorystring(all)Filter by DefiLlama category: DEX, Lending, CDP, Derivatives, Perpetuals, Liquid Staking, Bridge, Options, NFT Marketplace, RWA

Output

[
{
"type": "summary",
"protocols_with_fees_24h": 1847,
"total_fees_24h": 18400000,
"total_revenue_24h": 6200000,
"overall_margin_pct": 33.7,
"defi_fee_growth_trend": "sector_expanding",
"avg_price_to_fees_ratio": 42.8,
"fetched_at": "2026-09-02T08:22:00Z"
},
{
"list_type": "top_fees_24h",
"rank": 1,
"name": "Uniswap",
"slug": "uniswap",
"category": "Dexes",
"chains": ["ethereum", "arbitrum", "polygon", "optimism", "base"],
"fees_24h": 2840000,
"fees_7d": 19100000,
"fees_30d": 78400000,
"revenue_24h": 0,
"revenue_margin_pct": 0.0,
"protocol_profitability": "unsustainable",
"fee_growth_momentum": "stable",
"competitive_moat": "dominant",
"token_value_accrual": "buyback",
"fee_model_sustainability": "sustainable",
"valuation_vs_peers": "overvalued",
"revenue_quality_score": 0,
"protocol_growth_signal": "stable",
"macro_demand_sensitivity": "cyclical",
"fee_dominance_tier": "top10pct",
"sector_rank_in_category": "top_earner",
"sustainability_score": 38,
"revenue_diversification": "multi_chain",
"price_to_fees_ratio": 18.4,
"fetched_at": "2026-09-02T08:22:00Z"
}
]

Data fields

FieldDescription
nameProtocol display name
slugDefiLlama protocol identifier
categoryProtocol category (DEX, Lending, Derivatives, etc.)
chainsBlockchain networks where the protocol is deployed
fees_24hTotal fees paid by users in last 24h (USD)
fees_7dTotal fees over the last 7 days (USD)
fees_30dTotal fees over the last 30 days (USD)
revenue_24hFees retained by the protocol/developers in last 24h (USD)
revenue_margin_pctRevenue as % of fees (the protocol's take rate / "spread")
fee_growth_momentumexplosive, strong, growing, stable, declining, or collapsing
protocol_profitabilityhighly_profitable, profitable, break_even, subsidized, unsustainable
revenue_trendRecent fee trajectory: accelerating, stable, or declining
competitive_moatCategory fee market share: dominant, strong, competing, niche, losing_ground
sector_rank_in_categoryCompetitive position: top_earner, top_3, top_10, below_top_10
token_value_accrualHow fees reach token holders: direct_fee_sharing, buyback, treasury_only, no_accrual
fee_model_sustainabilitysustainable, hybrid, inflation_subsidy, or ponzi_risk
valuation_vs_peersP/F ratio percentile: deeply_undervalued, undervalued, fair, overvalued, extremely_overvalued
price_to_fees_ratioMarket cap / annualized fees — DeFi equivalent of P/E ratio
mcap_to_revenue_ratioMarket cap / annualized revenue (stricter P/E equivalent)
sustainability_score0–100 composite: revenue margin + revenue trend + fee yield
revenue_quality_score0–100 real yield quality: revenue/fees ratio (higher = less emissions-dependent)
protocol_growth_signalhypergrowth, growing, stable, declining, or dying
macro_demand_sensitivitycyclical (DEX/perps), defensive (lending/RWA), or counter_cyclical (options)
fee_dominance_tierGlobal fee ranking tier: top10pct, top25pct, top50pct, rest
revenue_diversificationmulti_chain, multi_product, single_product_single_chain, or concentrated_risk
quarterly_fee_run_rate_usdAnnualized 30d fees / 4 — quarterly revenue equivalent
revenue_per_chain_usdDaily revenue divided by number of chains deployed
fee_revenue_growth_rate_7d_pct7d daily average vs 30d daily average (positive = accelerating)
ve_token_apyEstimated ve-token staker APY for ve-model protocols (e.g. Curve, Velodrome)

Cost estimation

Pricing: $0.005 flat per run — scans all 2,000+ DefiLlama protocols regardless of the topN filter.

ScenarioProtocols ScannedEstimated Cost
Single on-demand run2,000+$0.005
Daily scheduled runs (30/month)2,000+ × 30$0.15/month
Hourly monitoring (720/month)2,000+ × 720$3.60/month

FAQ

Q: Do I need a DefiLlama API key? No. The actor queries the public DefiLlama fees API (api.llama.fi/overview/fees) which requires no authentication. Data is available for 2,000+ protocols across all major blockchains.

Q: What is the difference between fees_24h and revenue_24h? fees_24h is the total amount paid by users to use the protocol — for a DEX this is the swap fee, for a lending protocol this is the interest spread. revenue_24h is the portion that the protocol itself retains (goes to the DAO treasury, developers, or token holders). The difference typically goes to liquidity providers. The revenue_margin_pct field expresses revenue as a percentage of fees — the protocol's effective take rate.

Q: How is valuation_vs_peers calculated? It computes the price_to_fees_ratio (market cap divided by annualized fees) for every protocol in the run that has market cap data, then ranks the current protocol by percentile against all peers. A protocol in the bottom 20% of P/F ratios is labeled deeply_undervalued; the top 20% is extremely_overvalued. This is analogous to P/E screening in equity analysis.


Disclaimer: Fee and revenue data is sourced from DefiLlama and reflects on-chain activity as reported by each protocol. Valuation signals and growth labels are algorithmic computations and do not constitute investment advice. DeFi protocol revenue can change rapidly due to market conditions, governance decisions, and tokenomics changes.

Keywords: DeFi fee ranker, DeFi protocol revenue, DefiLlama fees, protocol profitability, DeFi earnings, fee revenue ratio, DeFi revenue ranking, on-chain fees, crypto protocol fees, DeFi analytics


Feedback

If this actor powers your DeFi research, a review helps others find it: Leave a review on Apify Store