Threads Creator Finder — Find Influencers by Topic
Pricing
from $14.00 / 1,000 creators
Threads Creator Finder — Find Influencers by Topic
Find Threads (Meta) creators talking about any topic, enriched with follower counts, bios and bio links — plus how they actually perform on that topic (posts, likes, replies). Ranks by topic engagement, not raw follower count. No login, no cookies.
Pricing
from $14.00 / 1,000 creators
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
Northbound Data
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
3 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Give it a topic. Get back the Threads (Meta) creators actually talking about it, with follower counts, bios, bio links — and how each one really performs on that topic.
No login. No cookies. No account of yours is ever used.
What makes this different
Most influencer tools rank creators by follower count. That tells you who is big. It does not tell you who is relevant.
This Actor ranks by engagement earned on your topic. Every record includes:
| Field | Why it matters |
|---|---|
likes_on_topic | How much the audience actually responded when this creator posted about your topic |
posts_on_topic | Whether this is a recurring theme for them or a one-off |
replies_on_topic | Whether their topic posts start conversations |
latest_post_url | Read the post yourself before you reach out |
A creator with 600 followers and 2,100 likes on your topic is often a better partner than one with 500,000 followers and 12. This Actor shows you both numbers so you can tell the difference.
Built on deep search
Threads exposes five separate public search surfaces (default, recent, top, users, tags), each capped by Meta at ~20 results but each returning a different set. Tools that query only the default surface see roughly a third of what is there.
This Actor queries all five and merges them, then aggregates the authors. Measured: a single topic yields ~50 posts from ~39 distinct creators, against ~20 posts from a single surface.
This is not a bypass — every surface is the same public endpoint the Threads website itself uses, read logged-out.
Filters that save you money
| Filter | Effect |
|---|---|
minFollowers | Skip creators below a follower threshold |
maxFollowers | Skip creators above one — pair with minFollowers to isolate a band |
requireBioLink | Keep only creators with an external link in their bio — usually the ones open to business contact |
maxCreatorsPerTopic | Cap per topic, ranked by topic engagement |
enrichProfiles: false | Skip profile enrichment for a much faster, cheaper run |
Filtered-out creators are never pushed and never billed. Creators appearing under several topics are deduplicated and billed once.
Why residential proxy is the default
Meta serves empty shell pages to datacenter IPs. When that happens this Actor falls back to full browser rendering, which still returns correct data but is dramatically slower and more expensive.
Measured on the Apify platform, same target, same day (2026-08-19):
| Proxy | Mode used | Time per profile | Compute cost per run |
|---|---|---|---|
| Datacenter (Apify default) | browser rendering | 150 s | $0.127 |
| Residential | direct fetch | 3.3 s | $0.0086 |
That is 45x faster and 15x cheaper, for a residential transfer cost of roughly 7% of what the returned records are worth. So RESIDENTIAL ships as the default proxy group.
You can override it, but if you switch to datacenter expect slow runs — the Actor will still work, it just has to render every page.
Input
{"topics": ["ai agents", "sustainable fashion"],"maxCreatorsPerTopic": 40,"minFollowers": 1000,"maxFollowers": 20000,"requireBioLink": true,"enrichProfiles": true,"maxItems": 1000}
| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
topics | array | Topics to find creators for. Each is searched across all five public search surfaces. |
maxCreatorsPerTopic | integer | Default 10. Creators per topic, ranked by engagement earned on that topic. |
minFollowers | integer | Default 0. Skip creators below this follower count. Filtered-out creators are never billed. |
maxFollowers | integer | No upper limit by default. Skip creators above this count. Set both to target a band — 1000–20000 isolates micro-influencers. Creators whose follower count could not be read are kept, not silently dropped. |
requireBioLink | boolean | Default false. Keep only creators with an external link in their bio — usually those open to business contact. |
enrichProfiles | boolean | Default true. Fetch each creator's profile for follower count, bio and bio link. Set false for a much faster, cheaper run that returns topic-activity data only. |
maxItems | integer | Hard cap on billed records. Your safety net. |
proxyConfiguration | object | Defaults to RESIDENTIAL. See the section above — datacenter IPs get shell pages from Meta and force slow rendering. |
Output
One record per creator:
{"username": "alexandro_ai","profile_url": "https://www.threads.com/@alexandro_ai","full_name": "Alexandro","is_verified": false,"follower_count": 8104,"biography": "Testing and showing how AI can…","external_url": "https://example.com","topic": "ai agents","posts_on_topic": 1,"likes_on_topic": 801,"replies_on_topic": 12,"latest_post_url": "https://www.threads.com/@alexandro_ai/post/XXXX","latest_post_at": "2026-08-14T09:12:00.000Z","scraped_at": "2026-08-15T08:40:00.000Z"}
Every run also writes a RUN_SUMMARY with topics, creatorsDelivered, failedTopics and failureRate, so you can audit reliability yourself.
Honest limitations
- Meta caps each public search surface at ~20 results. Merging all five gives ~50 posts per topic, which is where the ~39 creators come from. This finds the creators currently visible on a topic, not an exhaustive historical index. Anything promising a complete creator database without an account is not telling you the truth.
follower_countcomes from the public profile page. A small number of profiles do not expose it; those records carrynullrather than a guess.- No email addresses. Threads does not publish them, and we do not invent or infer contact details.
What it's used for
- Influencer marketing and partnership scouting — find topic-relevant Threads influencers, not just accounts with big follower counts
- Micro-influencer sourcing — the
minFollowers/maxFollowerswindow is there precisely so you can isolate micro influencers, who often out-convert large accounts on a niche topic - Brand ambassador discovery — surface people already posting about your product, unpaid, before you approach anyone
- UGC creator search — find Threads UGC creators making real content in your category
- Niche community mapping — see who actually drives a conversation in a small community
- Audience research — read a topic's active voices before you plan a campaign
- Competitive monitoring — track who is posting about a competitor
- AI agents & RAG — clean JSON in, no HTML parsing
Why "by topic" is the whole point
A creator with 200,000 followers who mentioned your category once is worth less to you than a creator with 4,000 followers whose posts on that exact topic earn hundreds of likes. This Actor ranks by engagement earned on your topic, not by follower count, which is why it is useful for micro influencer and brand ambassador work where relevance beats reach.
The official Threads API cannot do this at any permission level — its insights cover your own posts only, and there is no endpoint for another account's profile feed. Creator discovery is one of the few things that genuinely requires reading public pages. See the API-vs-scraping comparison.
Pricing
Pay per creator delivered. Filtered-out and duplicate creators are never billed. maxItems caps your spend.
Related
- Threads Scraper — Posts, Profiles, Replies & Search
- Threads Search Scraper — Keyword Search to JSON
The numbers behind this page
Everything this Actor claims about Threads' logged-out ceilings — the ~20 reply cap, the five search surfaces, the four profile tabs, and the empty shell page Meta serves to datacenter IPs as a valid HTTP 200 — is written up with the measurements, dates and method here:
What Threads actually returns when you are not logged in
It is a reference, not a sales page. If you are evaluating any Threads scraper, including someone else's, those are the limits to test them against.
Open-source client
There is a small MIT-licensed JavaScript client for this Actor, so you do not have to write the run-start / polling / dataset-pagination plumbing yourself:
github.com/zhanghengrui0308/threads-data-client — zero dependencies, Node 18+.
import { ThreadsClient } from 'threads-data-client';const threads = new ThreadsClient(process.env.APIFY_TOKEN);const creators = await threads.findCreators(['sustainable fashion'], { maxItems: 100 });
It also exposes estimateCost(actor, records, tier), which tells you the exact
USD bill for a run before you start it, at your own plan tier.
You do not need it — the Actor works fine from the Apify Console, the API, or any HTTP client. It is there if you would rather read the code than trust a description of it.
Legal & scope
Reads public Threads pages only. No login, no cookies, no CAPTCHA solving, no access-control circumvention. On robots.txt, stated plainly: threads.com/robots.txt runs an allowlist. Named crawlers
(Googlebot, Bingbot, GPTBot, ClaudeBot and others) are granted specific access; for every other user
agent the file says Disallow: /, and its opening notice states that automated collection requires
express written permission from Meta. This Actor is not on that allowlist. We say so because you
should decide with the real facts rather than a comfortable summary, and because you are the party
accountable for how the data is collected and used under Meta's terms and applicable law. Creator profiles are personal data — you are responsible for GDPR/CCPA compliance in how you use and store them.