US Federal Spending — Contracts, Grants & Loans
Pricing
$1.00 / 1,000 awards
US Federal Spending — Contracts, Grants & Loans
Search US federal contracts, grants and loans by recipient, agency or keyword — amounts awarded and actually paid, periods, agencies and place of performance, largest first.
Pricing
$1.00 / 1,000 awards
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
SourceRow
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
5 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Search US federal contracts, grants and loans by recipient, agency or keyword. Who received them, how much was promised, how much was actually paid, by which agency and for what.
What it does
USAspending.gov is the official record of United States government spending. This Actor searches it and returns one row per award with 22 fields, largest first.
The distinction it preserves is between what was awarded and what was paid.
amount_usd is the obligation; outlays_usd is money that has actually left
the Treasury. A large award with outlays near zero has barely started.
What you get
22 fields per row, including award_id, recipient_name, amount_usd,
outlays_usd, outlay_ratio, awarding_agency, awarding_sub_agency,
award_type, start_date, end_date, place_state, description and
duration_days.
The table view shows 12 of them; all 22 are in the JSON, CSV and Excel downloads.
Input
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
awardTypes | contracts, grants, loans, direct_payments, other. |
recipient | Recipient name. |
agency | Awarding agency. |
keyword | Free-text search. |
fromDate / toDate | Restrict by award period. |
maxAwards | Stop after this many. 0 removes the cap. |
{"awardTypes": ["contracts"],"recipient": "Lockheed Martin","maxAwards": 200}
Sample output
One record, trimmed to the fields shown in the table view:
{"award_id": "DENA0003525","recipient_name": "NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC","amount_usd": 42774168231.25,"outlays_usd": 26301056802.91,"outlay_ratio": 0.6149,"awarding_agency": "Department of Energy","awarding_sub_agency": "Department of Energy","award_type": "DEFINITIVE CONTRACT","start_date": "2017-01-18","end_date": "2027-04-30","place_state": "NM","issues": ""}
Pricing
| Event | Per 1,000 | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Award | $1.00 | One charge per award returned |
There is no start fee and no per-row dataset fee.
What it does not do
This is not financial or legal advice. It is the federal record, cleaned. Amounts are reported by the awarding agencies and are corrected over time.
Negative amounts are real. De-obligations appear as negative outlays and
negative ratios. issues marks them negative_amount. Exclude them for gross
awards, include them for net spending, but decide which you mean.
No sub-awards. This returns prime awards. Money passed from a prime contractor to subcontractors is reported separately and is not in these rows.
Descriptions are often missing. Agencies are inconsistent about filling
them. issues marks no_description rather than leaving a silent blank.
Search is by the fields above, not full text over documents. There is no contract text here, only the award record.
Notes
Sort by outlay_ratio rather than by amount to see what is actually being
spent. A large obligation with a ratio near zero has barely started.
period_ended separates finished contracts from live ones without comparing
dates by hand.
Search by recipient to map a competitor's federal revenue; by agency and keyword to find who is winning work in a field.
Support
Open the Issues tab with the award_id and the field that looks wrong.
Licence and attribution
Award data from USAspending.gov, the official source of United States government spending data, published by the Department of the Treasury. As a work of the US federal government it carries no copyright under 17 U.S.C. 105. The Treasury does not endorse this Actor.