Review Gap Finder — Apps Losing Rating Points, Ranked
Pricing
from $1.00 / 1,000 results
Review Gap Finder — Apps Losing Rating Points, Ranked
For a list of apps, get recent reviews, find the ones dragging the rating down, and rank every app by its review gap — the negative reviews with nobody answering. Built for reputation agencies and app teams.
Pricing
from $1.00 / 1,000 results
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
alaudin burki
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
a day ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Review Gap Finder — Apps Losing Rating Points, Ranked for Outreach
Give it a list of apps and get back which ones are losing rating points and have nobody answering — ranked worst-first, ready to work through.
The point is the gap, not the rating. An app sitting at 4.7 lifetime but averaging 2.9 in its most recent reviews is in trouble right now and its team may not have noticed. That difference is the whole product.
What you get
Dataset gaps — one row per app, worst first. This is the deliverable.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
app, developer, appId | Which app |
reviewsSampled | How many recent reviews were read |
negative / positive | Counts of 1–2★ and 4–5★ |
negativeShare | Percentage of the sample that is negative |
recentAvgRating | Average of the sampled reviews |
storeAvgRating | The app's lifetime average |
ratingGap | storeAvgRating − recentAvgRating — positive means it is slipping |
gap | negative count — the ranking number, because volume matters |
lowestRatedReview | The worst recent review, quoted |
url | App Store link |
Default dataset — one row per review
id, appId, store, rating, title, body, author, version, updatedAt, voteCount,
voteSum, scrapedAt.
Sample output
Read that row: half the most recent reviews are one or two stars, the recent average is 2.94, and the app's public rating still says 4.69. That is a 1.75-point gap — and a conversation.
Default input
Runs with no editing: ["WhatsApp Messenger", "Instagram", "Spotify"], US storefront, 3 pages
(150 most recent reviews) per app.
Limitations — read this before you buy
- Apple App Store only, right now. That is the one store with a clean public review feed.
- Google Play is NOT implemented. Its app page is a ~1.1 MB JavaScript blob and reviews load from a signed internal call. Not faked, not estimated — absent.
- Google Maps, Trustpilot and Yelp return HTTP 403 or a JavaScript shell with no data. The local-business version of this idea — the big one — needs a real browser runtime and is recorded as blocked rather than shipped broken.
- Apple's feed has no developer replies, so
unansweredcannot be computed there. The gap score is used instead, which is a different and defensible signal: negative volume plus a recent-vs-lifetime divergence. - This samples the most recent reviews, not all of them. A long-established app with millions of reviews will show a small sample. Treat it as "what people are saying now", not a full audit.
- No sentiment model. 1–2★ is negative, 4–5★ is positive, 3★ is neither. That is deliberate: it is explainable, and it cannot hallucinate.
Notes
- Two datasets on purpose. The ranked prospect list would be buried under thousands of review rows if they shared one dataset.
- The app's own entry is the first item in Apple's feed and carries no rating — it is skipped by that field rather than by index, so a change in feed order cannot corrupt the sample.
