Google Maps Extractor avatar
Google Maps Extractor

Pricing

$6.00 / 1,000 results

Go to Store
Google Maps Extractor

Google Maps Extractor

compass/google-maps-extractor

Developed by

Compass

Maintained by Apify

Extract data from hundreds of places fast. Scrape Google Maps by keyword, category, location, URLs & other filters. Get addresses, contact info, opening hours, popular times, prices, menus & more. Export scraped data, run the scraper via API, schedule and monitor runs, or integrate with other tools.

4.3 (62)

Pricing

$6.00 / 1,000 results

859

Monthly users

5.5k

Runs succeeded

96%

Response time

3 days

Last modified

4 hours ago

US

"Skip closed places" not working?

Closed
upscale_song opened this issue
2 months ago

According to the docs "Skip closed places" should not return temporarily closed places, but it is.

US

upscale_song

2 months ago

I see the problem. The data is not matching google. I haven't checked very much yet, but "price" is not matching for many places, and "temporarilyClosed" is wrong for at least one i have see. When was the last time this data was scraped?

US

upscale_song

2 months ago

I am searching restaurants. From a list of about 700, every single restaurant that has a price in yen "¥1,000–2,000" has no review distribution data, it is empty. Every restaurant that has a $ sign for price has the review distribution.

aja_bar avatar

Hi, thank you for reporting and sorry about the delayed response. Can you please share the run and provide an example of the non-matching data? We'll look into it. Thank you!

US

upscale_song

a month ago

ID: QPkbzdn1bZcOdxi1A

thank you

aja_bar avatar

Thank you! This seems to be a run of Google Maps Scraper (different Actor). That Actor however should collect review distribution data for all places, regardless of the currency used for pricing. I’ve created an internal ticket for us to investigate, we’ll look into it. As for the "temporarilyClosed" places being shown as open - could you provide an example? It seems to be matching in this run. Thank you!

US

upscale_song

a month ago

To be honest this thread has been over so many weeks, I can't remember which one was the problem. They all have the same issue, and the reply I gave was for verification on your explanation which seemed a little contradictory :) Anyway, the Apify docs are clearly incorrect, and a review and image count has to be entered and not left blank for "all", as it says on your site. I have put high limits as a workaround. No need to reply, as this seems to be going nowhere.

aja_bar avatar

Thank you for getting back and providing feedback. We reviewed it and the docs are really correct, this is how the parameters should work. We’ve compensated your run QPkbzdn1bZcOdxi1A, where this didn’t apply and are looking into it. I apologise for the inconvenience. I’m closing this issue here and will get back to you in the other open one regarding the same topic. Thank you for your understanding!

US

upscale_song

a month ago

I was just typing to get clarification. Which I still have not gotten. Refunding me $0 as I am on a monthly plan was a bit of a weird move...

Pricing

Pricing model

Pay per result 

This Actor is paid per result. You are not charged for the Apify platform usage, but only a fixed price for each dataset of 1,000 items in the Actor outputs.

Price per 1,000 items

$6.00