Landing Page Audit

Give it landing page URLs and get a conversion audit for each one: a score from 0 to 100, seven sub-scores, the problems ranked by impact with a concrete fix for each, headline and call-to-action rewrites, quick wins, mobile notes, and an AI-readiness check (can ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read and cite the page).

Every page is loaded in a real browser on desktop and on mobile. An AI model reviews the screenshots and the copy and scores seven conversion areas, the way a CRO consultant would. It is the same audit that runs at pagecritic.app.

What you get for each URL

	Full report (default)	Free result
Conversion score and 7 sub-scores (clarity, value proposition, call to action, trust, design, mobile, SEO basics)	Yes	Yes
Problems, each with why it matters and how to fix it	All 10–15, ranked by impact	The 3 biggest
What already works	Yes	Yes
Headline rewrites	3	–
Call-to-action rewrites	3	–
Quick wins you can ship in under an hour	5	–
Mobile review	Yes	–
AI readiness	Score, findings, per-bot access and fixes to paste (robots.txt, JSON-LD, llms.txt)	Score and the top finding
Link to a shareable web version of the report	Yes	Yes

Input

{
  "urls": ["https://plausible.io"],
  "fullReport": true
}

• urls: the pages to audit, up to 50 per run. Duplicates are removed.
• fullReport: off (default) for the free result, on for the full report.

Output

One dataset item per URL. Shortened example:

{
  "url": "https://plausible.io",
  "status": "done",
  "report_url": "https://pagecritic.app/r/15fa2fba39567058f7e29616",
  "score": 78,
  "verdict": "A clean, well-positioned landing page whose conversion rate is held back by keeping its world-class social proof and punchiest differentiators buried below the fold.",
  "subscores": { "clarity": 88, "value_prop": 82, "cta": 80, "trust": 72, "design": 85, "mobile": 74, "seo_basics": 86 },
  "top_issues": [
    { "title": "Stellar social proof is completely missing above the fold", "why": "…", "fix": "…" }
  ],
  "what_works": ["Uncluttered visual hierarchy with clear contrast on the primary purple CTA.", "…"],
  "ai_readiness": { "score": 91, "findings_count": 3 },
  "full_report": {
    "unlocked": true,
    "issues": [{ "title": "Burying the 'no cookie banner needed' hook", "area": "value_prop", "impact": "high", "why": "…", "fix": "…" }],
    "headline_rewrites": [{ "headline": "Simple, privacy-first web analytics you can set up in 2 minutes.", "subheadline": "…" }],
    "cta_rewrites": ["Start your 30-day free trial", "…"],
    "quick_wins": ["…"],
    "mobile_notes": "…",
    "ai": { "score": 91, "findings": [], "bots": [] }
  }
}

The full sample report is at pagecritic.app/r/df429a71189cbb370bb754b7.

Pricing

Pay per event. You pay only for pages that were audited:

• Free result (default): $0.10 per URL
• Full report (fullReport on): $4.99 per URL

Platform usage is included. A page that can't be audited (it blocks automated browsers, times out or isn't a web page) returns an item with an error field and is not charged. You can set a maximum charge per run; the run stops when it is reached.

Good to know

• An audit takes 30 to 90 seconds per page. The URLs in a run are audited one after another.
• Public pages only. Pages behind a login can't be audited.
• Some sites show automated browsers a bot check (Cloudflare, for example). Those pages return an error item, free of charge.
• In a busy hour some URLs can come back with a "try again later" error, also free of charge. Run them again a little later.
• Questions or a report that looks wrong: hello@pagecritic.app.