Reddit Willingness-to-Pay Evidence Miner
Pricing
from $0.66 / 1,000 evidence records
Reddit Willingness-to-Pay Evidence Miner
Mine public Reddit discussions for explicit prices, budgets, subscriptions, paid workarounds, hiring, and launch dates. Get exact quotes and source links for pricing research in Google Sheets, Airtable, Notion, or n8n. No sentiment guessing or AI summaries.
Pricing
from $0.66 / 1,000 evidence records
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
GetAScraper
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
6 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
💸 Reddit Willingness-to-Pay Evidence Miner
|
REDDIT MARKET SIGNALS SUITE Five focused monitors for feedback, pricing evidence, switch signals, activity cadence, and announcements. | ||||
|
Feedback clusters Recurring feature-request themes |
Pricing evidence ➤ You are here |
Switch signals Explicit product migration evidence |
Activity cadence Recent posting-gap snapshots |
Announcements Keyword-matched community posts |
|
Find the prices, budgets, and paid workarounds people state in their own words. Turn recent public Reddit discussions into exact, source-linked willingness-to-pay evidence for pricing and product research. |
|
💬 Exact quotes Review the statement behind every result |
💵 Clean amounts Compare currencies, ranges, and billing periods |
🔗 Source links Trace each pricing signal to its public source |
🔁 Repeat ready Separate newly found evidence from known records |
Use this Reddit social listening Actor to validate pricing assumptions with observed evidence. It finds literal economic statements without sentiment scores or AI summaries.
🔍 What this Actor does
Choose one public subreddit or one public Reddit post. The Actor inspects a bounded recent window and returns direct economic evidence.
It can identify these evidence types:
- Currency amounts and ranges
- Subscription payments and billing periods
- Paid workarounds
- Hiring and contractor spending
- Explicit budgets
- ISO-formatted launch dates
Every result keeps the exact excerpt and public source URL. Missing values stay empty instead of becoming invented labels.
| ⚡ Use evidence, not a guessed intent score. Review the original wording before changing a price, package, or roadmap. |
👥 Who uses it
- SaaS founders validating pricing before building
- Product managers collecting budget and payment evidence
- Pricing strategists comparing amounts and billing periods
- Researchers building source-linked customer evidence libraries
- Agencies exporting findings to Google Sheets, Airtable, or Notion
🚀 How to use it
|
STEP 1 Choose a source Enter one subreddit name or public post URL. |
STEP 2 Select evidence Keep the economic statement types and literal terms you need. |
STEP 3 Run and export Review exact evidence, then export or schedule another run. |
📥 Input
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
sourceType | String | No | Choose subreddit or postUrl. The default is subreddit. |
source | String | Yes | One subreddit name or one public Reddit post URL. |
evidenceTypes | Array | No | Select amounts, subscriptions, paid workarounds, hiring, budgets, or launch dates. |
requiredTerms | Array | No | Keep results containing at least one literal term you provide. |
limit | Integer | No | Inspect 1 to 25 recent entries. The default is 10. |
The Actor needs no Reddit login, account token, proxy setting, or private source access.
📤 Data you receive
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
status | String | NEW on first discovery or KNOWN on a later matching run. |
evidenceType | String | The direct economic statement category. |
excerpt | String | Exact source text that produced the record. |
sourceUrl | String | Public link to the supporting Reddit post or comment. |
sourceKind | String | Whether the evidence came from a post or comment. |
amountRaw | String | Original matched amount text when present. |
amount | Number | Normalized single amount when unambiguous. |
amountMin | Number | Lower bound for an explicit range. |
amountMax | Number | Upper bound for an explicit range. |
currency | String | Currency code when the source makes it clear. |
billingPeriod | String | Stated billing period when present. |
launchDate | String | Explicit launch date when present. |
normalizationUncertain | Boolean | Shows when a normalization needs human review. |
subreddit | String | Source community name when available. |
observedAt | String | Publication or update time from the source. |
This example comes from a verified cloud run:
{"status": "KNOWN","evidenceType": "AMOUNT","amountRaw": "$422","amount": 422,"currency": "USD","excerpt": "$422, up from the normal average of about $25.","sourceUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1vmgewa/my_ci_bill_went_up_16x_because_of_ai/","sourceKind": "POST","subreddit": "saas"}
Download results as JSON, CSV, Excel, XML, or HTML from the Apify dataset.
🔄 Repeat runs and scheduling
Run the same configuration again to distinguish NEW evidence from KNOWN evidence. This makes scheduled pricing research easier to review.
Use Apify schedules for recurring checks. A five-minute or longer interval is recommended because Reddit may temporarily limit frequent requests.
⚠️ Coverage and responsible use
- Results represent a bounded recent source window, not complete Reddit history.
- A valid empty result means no matching evidence appeared in the observed window.
- Amounts are observed statements, not proof of market demand or statistical willingness to pay.
- Deleted, private, restricted, or unavailable content is not collected.
- Failed or incomplete runs do not advance the saved comparison baseline.
- Commercial use requires the permissions and policy review applicable to your use case.
💰 Pricing
Your cost follows the Apify platform usage shown for each run. Each batch checks one bounded source window to keep resource use predictable.
Review the current run estimate in Apify before starting. The Actor has no external subscription or credential requirement.
⭐ Enjoying Reddit Willingness-to-Pay Evidence Miner?
|
⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ Help more product teams find source-linked pricing evidence. A 5-star rating takes 10 seconds and helps founders and pricing researchers find this Actor. Your feedback guides future improvements. |
| ★ Rate this Actor on Apify |
🔌 Integrations
Send results to Google Sheets, Airtable, Notion, Slack, n8n, Make, Zapier, or your preferred Apify integration.
Common workflows include a pricing evidence library, a weekly budget-signal review, and source-linked research for product discovery.
❓ FAQ
Does this Actor use AI to decide what people will buy?
No. It uses direct statement patterns and preserves the exact source text for review.
Does a price mention prove willingness to pay?
No. It is observed economic evidence. You decide whether the context supports your research question.
Can it search all Reddit history?
No. It checks a bounded recent window from one public source per run.
Can I monitor one public post instead of a subreddit?
Yes. Choose postUrl and provide one public Reddit post URL.
What happens when Reddit limits a request?
The run reports the problem and protects the previous comparison baseline.
🔗 Other actors
- Hacker News Job Scraper: Who is Hiring Posts ↗ - Collect structured hiring posts for market and talent research.
- Serchen Scraper: B2B Software Reviews & Directory Leads ↗ - Extract B2B software reviews and vendor listings.
- Quora Q&A Change Monitor ↗ - Track changes to public questions and answers.
- Threads Monitor: Public Post Changes ↗ - Monitor public post changes and mention evidence.