Synthetic Financial Data Generator avatar

Synthetic Financial Data Generator

Pricing

Pay per event

Go to Apify Store
Synthetic Financial Data Generator

Synthetic Financial Data Generator

Generate realistic synthetic financial transaction data with category-aware amounts, temporal spending patterns, running balances, and configurable fraud labels for ML training and fintech testing

Pricing

Pay per event

Rating

0.0

(0)

Developer

BowTiedRaccoon

BowTiedRaccoon

Maintained by Community

Actor stats

0

Bookmarked

4

Total users

2

Monthly active users

5 days ago

Last modified

Share

Generate realistic synthetic financial data for ML model training, fintech QA pipelines, and data platform development. Produces bank-statement-quality synthetic financial transactions with category-aware amounts, temporal spending patterns, running balances, and configurable fraud labels — no real user data required. Synthetic financial data from this generator is safe for sharing across teams, committing to repositories, and embedding in demos.

What it does

This actor generates synthetic financial transactions that mimic real banking data. No web scraping is involved -- all data is computed locally using statistical models.

Each transaction includes:

  • Account details -- holder name, account type (checking, savings, credit, investment), account ID
  • Transaction data -- amount, date, category, merchant name, MCC code, description
  • Running balance -- accurate per-account balance tracking across all transactions
  • Fraud labels (optional) -- binary fraud flag, fraud type classification, anomaly score

Categories and amount distributions

Transactions are distributed across 12 spending categories with realistic amount ranges:

CategoryRangeDistribution
Groceries$15 -- $250Log-normal (mean $65)
Rent$800 -- $3,500Normal (mean $1,500)
Salary$2,000 -- $8,000Normal (mean $4,500)
Dining$8 -- $120Log-normal (mean $35)
Coffee$3 -- $9Normal (mean $5.50)
Shopping$10 -- $500Log-normal (mean $75)
Transport$2 -- $100Log-normal (mean $25)
Utilities$40 -- $350Normal (mean $150)
Entertainment$5 -- $80Log-normal (mean $25)
Healthcare$15 -- $600Log-normal (mean $120)
Subscriptions$5 -- $50Normal (mean $15)
Transfers$50 -- $2,000Log-normal (mean $500)

Temporal patterns

  • Weekday/weekend bias -- coffee and transport spike on weekdays; dining and entertainment spike on weekends
  • Recurring transactions -- salary deposits (1st and 15th), rent (1st), utilities (15th), subscriptions (variable day)
  • Seasonal multipliers -- spending increases in November (1.15x) and December (1.30x), dips in January (0.85x)
  • Time-of-day realism -- coffee purchases at 6-11 AM, dining at 11 AM-10 PM, salary at 8 AM

Fraud injection

When enabled, a configurable percentage of transactions are flagged as fraudulent with:

  • Fraud types: card_stolen, account_takeover, card_not_present, synthetic_identity
  • Anomaly pattern: fraudulent amounts are 2-8x the normal category maximum
  • Fraud score: 0.7-1.0 for fraudulent transactions, 0.0-0.3 for legitimate ones

Input

FieldTypeDefaultDescription
maxItemsinteger100Number of transactions to generate
numAccountsinteger5Number of unique financial accounts
currencystringUSDCurrency code (USD, EUR, GBP, JPY, CAD, AUD)
dateRangeMonthsinteger6Months of history to generate
fraudRatenumber2Percentage of fraudulent transactions (0-100)
includeFraudLabelsbooleantrueInclude fraud detection fields in output
seedinteger0Random seed for reproducible output

Output

Each transaction record contains:

{
"transaction_id": "397b9202-8ace-4fc4-9fa2-464893c3bc34",
"account_id": "ACCT-0001",
"account_holder": "Brenda Upton",
"account_type": "checking",
"currency": "USD",
"date": "2025-10-03T09:25:27.000Z",
"amount": -65.42,
"type": "debit",
"category": "groceries",
"merchant_name": "Whole Foods",
"merchant_category_code": "5411",
"balance_after": 4231.58,
"is_recurring": false,
"description": "Whole Foods - groceries purchase",
"is_fraudulent": false,
"fraud_type": null,
"fraud_score": 0.12
}

When includeFraudLabels is false, the is_fraudulent, fraud_type, and fraud_score fields are omitted.

Use cases

Synthetic financial data is the safest way to build and test financial software without exposing real customer records:

  • ML model training -- fraud detection, transaction categorization, anomaly detection, and credit scoring models all need labeled synthetic financial data to train without privacy risk
  • Fintech QA -- payment processing pipelines, accounting software, and budgeting apps need realistic transactions for integration tests
  • Data pipeline development -- ETL workflows, data warehouse testing, and API mocking all benefit from a reproducible synthetic financial data fixture
  • Fraud model training -- configurable fraud rate and four fraud-type labels make this a purpose-built source of labeled synthetic financial fraud data
  • Demo data -- realistic financial dashboards and investor reports that can be shared publicly

FAQ

Is synthetic financial data safe to use in production environments?

Yes. Because synthetic financial data is statistically generated — not derived from real accounts — it carries no PII risk, no regulatory exposure, and no data-sharing restrictions. It can be committed to repos, passed to third-party vendors, and embedded in product demos.

How realistic is the synthetic financial data?

Each category (groceries, rent, salary, dining, etc.) is sampled from a calibrated statistical distribution with realistic mean and variance. Temporal patterns mirror real banking data: salary deposits on the 1st and 15th, weekend dining spikes, seasonal November/December uplift. The output passes basic financial-data sanity checks used in model evaluation.

Can I use this alongside other synthetic data generators?

Yes. If you need synthetic financial data combined with synthetic customer profiles or synthetic e-commerce orders, pair this actor with the Synthetic Dataset Generator or the Synthetic E-commerce Data Generator.

Reproducibility

Set the seed parameter to any positive integer to get identical output across runs. This is useful for:

  • Consistent test fixtures
  • Reproducible ML training datasets
  • Deterministic integration tests

Performance

  • Sub-second generation for 1,000 transactions
  • 256 MB memory sufficient for up to 50,000 transactions
  • No network requests -- pure computation