Tweet Scraper|$0.25/1K Tweets | Pay-Per Result | No Rate Limits
Pricing
$0.25 / 1,000 tweets
Tweet Scraper|$0.25/1K Tweets | Pay-Per Result | No Rate Limits
Only $0.25/1000 tweets for Twitter scraping, 100% reliability, swift data retrieval.This incredible low price is almost too good to be true.Thanks to our large-scale operations and efficient servers, we can offer you rock-bottom prices that no competitors can match. Don't miss this opportunity !
4.3 (13)
Pricing
$0.25 / 1,000 tweets
102
Monthly users
661
Runs succeeded
>99%
Response time
1.9 hours
Last modified
3 hours ago
Please tell me why you're charging so much.
Closed
Why are there so many reads of the data, I've only sent a few requests to get tweets in total. And the most I've ever had was just over a hundred pieces of data, showing over a thousand reads, but when I finally counted the cost there were actually over six million reads. Why? I thought it was only $0.25 per thousand tweets? But now that I look at it, it's much more than that, it took a lot of reading from the platform, so what exactly is the charge here?
Your request this time returned 111 results, and you will only be charged at a rate of $0.00025 per result. Why do you say the charge is high? The information in your screenshots has nothing to do with the final charge.
What does it mean by "actually reading more than 6 million times"? Your account is a free one, and there is only a credit of $5 given to you by the system in total. How can you achieve 6 million reads?
Please look at my screenshot. In the end, you will only pay for 111 results.
patient_marmalade
I mean, the most I've ever gotten in one request was over a hundred tweets, so going by what you guys are saying: a thousand tweets cost $0.25, surely that's not more than $1, right? But when you look at the screenshot of my bill, it shows: I read the stored data more than six million times, and here I incurred a cost of $2.43. I don't understand why so many reads were recorded? Because the most I've ever looked at a request shows only a thousand or so reads, and I've noticed that just in the time it took me to submit the question, it actually added a few hundred more reads. I'm just wondering how the reads stored data is actually calculated here, because as I originally understood the total cost of fetching a thousand tweets should be right around $0.25 without any other charges that expensive. I tested it down to fetching a few hundred tweets of data, but my total bill was around $4, which is way beyond my expectations, and if that's the case, I wouldn't consider using this service in my official production environment.
Hello,We only charge for the results. Please look at my first screenshot. You can see the results of each of your requests and the corresponding fees in the Run tab. Then, take a look at my second screenshot. You were only charged $0.44 for using our actor. As for the $2.43 fee resulting from 6 million calls shown below, it might be the cost you incurred by repeatedly reading data from the datasets. I'm not sure what these 6 million reads refer to, and it has nothing to do with our actor. If you have any questions about this fee, you can refer to the documentation or consult the platform.
Best regards.
You can click on the question mark to see what's going on.
patient_marmalade
Okay, thanks.
Pricing
Pricing model
Pay per resultThis Actor is paid per result. You are not charged for the Apify platform usage, but only a fixed price for each dataset of 1,000 items in the Actor outputs.
Price per 1,000 items
$0.25
