Email OSINT Lookup - Find Accounts, Breaches & Identity
Pricing
from $10.40 / 1,000 results
Email OSINT Lookup - Find Accounts, Breaches & Identity
Email OSINT for investigators, fraud and security teams: check which of 133 platforms an address is registered on, get the name and profile links behind it, its data breach history and an A-F risk score. One row per account found; pay only for found accounts.
Pricing
from $10.40 / 1,000 results
Rating
4.3
(3)
Developer
SR
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
9
Bookmarked
3.2K
Total users
173
Monthly active users
16 days ago
Last modified
Share
Email OSINT Lookup
Email OSINT lookup for investigators, fraud teams and security researchers. Give it an email address; it finds the accounts registered to it on 133 platforms, who the address belongs to, and which data breaches it has been exposed in.
Only definitive account findings become dataset rows. Checks that cannot complete
are reported as unknown, never as "no account". Checks that require sending
login or recovery email, or creating an account, are also left unresolved. A source
that does not answer must not become a confident negative.
What this email OSINT lookup returns
Identity enrichment
Not just a yes/no. Where the data exists, you get a name and real profile URLs.
| Source | Returns |
|---|---|
| Gravatar | Real name, location, job title, and verified LinkedIn / X / GitHub / Instagram profile URLs |
| GitHub | GitHub username and profile resolved from commit authorship |
Account detection
| Group | Platforms |
|---|---|
| Learning & education (19) | Alison, Allen, Asafeer, Aslbloom, Babbel, Bnrlanguages, Bunpo, Cakeapp, Cambly, Classdojo, Coursera, Duolingo, Hanzii, Hellochinese, Heyjapan, Programminghub, Quizlet, Talkpal, Vedantu |
| Developer & tech (18) | Codecademy, Codewars, Devrant, Envato, Hackerearth, Hackerone, Hackerrank, Hackthebox, Howtogeek, Huggingface, Luarocks, Medium, Qiita, Rubygems, Wix, Wondershare, Wordpress, Xda |
| Social (14) | Classmates, Couplejoy, Facebook, Instagram, Locket, Lovenudge, Mastodon, Meeff, Mewe, Pinterest, Plurk, Slowly, Whering, X |
| Entertainment (11) | Anilist, Appletv, Dreame, Girlslife, Hoichoi, Justwatch, Myanimelist, Nebula Tv, Stremio, Sunnxt, Weverse |
| Shopping & commerce (11) | Amazon, Etsy, Fixderma, Flipkart, Hautesauce, Naturabuy, Nykaaman, Rappi, Tatacliq, Vivino, Walmart |
| Productivity & other (10) | Anydo, Dragongroot, Dropbox, Eventbrite, Firefox, Moz, Numsify, Office365, Screener, Secondline |
| Creator & design (8) | Adobe, Buymeacoffee, Canva, Figma, Flickr, Kick, Patreon, Vimeo |
| News & media (7) | Aljazeera, Bbc, Cnn, Flipboard, Foxnews, Globaltimes, Indiatimes |
| Sports (7) | Aiscore, Besoccer, Espn, Marca, Nba, Playtomic, Uniscore |
| Fitness (5) | Evolveyou, Finch, Fitnessblender, Myfitnesspal, Sweat |
| Music (5) | Deezer, Gaana, Jiosaavn, Mixcloud, Spotify |
| Gaming (4) | Addictinggames, Chess Com, Crazygames, Stackb |
| CRM (3) | Axonaut, Insightly, Zoho |
| Dating (3) | Lespark, Okcupid, Skout |
| Travel (3) | Komoot, Polarsteps, Skyscanner |
| Community (2) | Disqus, Nextdoor |
| Hosting (2) | Neocities and one CDN hosting provider |
| Jobs (1) | Freelancer |
Email analysis
Format validation, disposable detection, free-provider detection, business-domain
detection, role-account detection (info@, admin@), and name hints.
Security intelligence
Breach history and an A–F risk score based on exposure and account activity.
Input
| Field | Type | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
emails | string[] | Yes | None | Addresses to investigate, one per line |
max_results_per_email | integer | No | 25 | Cap on sources reported per address. You are billed per found source, so this is your cost ceiling per address. 0 disables it |
max_concurrency | integer | No | 10 | Emails processed at once (1–10) |
A run processes at most five addresses; anything beyond the first five is not looked up. Split larger lists across runs. A minimal input:
{"emails": ["beau@dentedreality.com.au"],"max_results_per_email": 25}
Output
The dataset holds one row per channel where the address was found. A row says one thing, so it reads as a table and exports straight to CSV:
| channel | found | username | profile_url | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| beau@dentedreality.com.au | amazon | true | null | null |
| beau@dentedreality.com.au | anydo | true | null | null |
| beau@dentedreality.com.au | gravatar | true | Beau Lebens | https://gravatar.com/beau |
username and profile_url are filled for the channels that expose them and
null elsewhere, so the columns stay stable. These example rows were retrieved
from the address shown; results can change as source availability changes.
Per-address context is identical on every row, so it is not repeated there. Two records accompany the run instead:
FULL_RESULTS— one complete record per address: email analysis, every breach with its exposed-data categories, the full channel map, and every unresolved check.NO_RESULTS— addresses where nothing was found, and separately any address whose lookup failed. A failed lookup is not the same as finding nothing: nothing is known about it. Neither produces rows and neither is billed.
For the same example address, the summary in FULL_RESULTS read:
{"summary": {"accounts_found": 11,"accounts_checked": 101,"accounts_unresolved": 38,"is_active_email": true,"risk_score": "B"},"breach_info": {"breached": true,"breach_count": 31,"risk_label": "High","risk_score": 73}}
Each breach entry carries its name, year, industry, whether it is verified and the exposed data categories (for example "Dates of birth"). Passwords are never returned.
Use cases
- Fraud prevention. A sign-up address with no footprint anywhere, a disposable domain and no breach history is a different risk from one with a decade of accounts. Use the email OSINT result as one signal in a review queue.
- Investigations and due diligence. See where an address is registered and which public identity sits behind it: a Gravatar name, location, job title and linked LinkedIn, X, GitHub or Instagram profiles.
- Security awareness. Check staff or customer addresses for breach exposure and see which categories of data leaked, without ever handling a password.
- Account takeover triage. A high breach count combined with many active accounts tells you which users to prompt for a password reset first.
Email OSINT compared with other tools
Open-source tools such as holehe answer one question per platform: is this address registered? Running them yourself means installing Python, keeping the modules working as sites change, and reading terminal output. This actor runs the same kind of account checks as a hosted batch job, and adds three things in the same run:
| This actor | A plain account checker | A breach checker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts on 133 platforms | Yes | Yes | No |
| Name and linked profiles (Gravatar, GitHub) | Yes | No | No |
| Breach history with exposed-data categories | Yes | No | Yes |
| A–F risk score | Yes | No | Sometimes |
| Unknown kept separate from "no account" | Yes | Often not | Not applicable |
| Billing | Per account found | Varies | Per address |
The distinction between unknown and "no account" matters most. A check that
times out or is rate-limited is listed in accounts_unknown, so you never read a
dead source as a clean negative.
Pricing
You are billed per found source, not per address. If an address turns up five sources, you pay for five. If it turns up nothing, there is no found-source charge. The existing actor-start fee still applies.
Use max_results_per_email to set a hard ceiling per address. It defaults to
25, which covers a typical address comfortably while stopping a heavily-used
one from returning 80+ billable channels. When the cap truncates, the rows that
carry an identity (username, profile URL) are kept in preference, and the run
reports that the channel limit was reached. FULL_RESULTS always holds the
complete channel map, so nothing is hidden by the cap.
| Event | Price | When it fires |
|---|---|---|
| Found source (main) | $0.0104 | Once for each source an address was found on |
| Actor start | $0.00005 | Per GB of run memory, minimum one event |
Two things are never billed:
- Unknowns. A check that could not complete is not a found source.
- Unreliable sources. A check that cannot tell a real address from an impossible one never produces a finding, so it never charges.
Notes
- Checks that would send a login or recovery message, or create an account, remain unresolved. They do not produce a billed finding.
- The account scan runs for every valid address. Availability varies by platform; the unresolved-check list describes what could not be determined.
- Duration depends on source availability and the number of addresses. A lookup that exceeds its time budget is recorded as failed and does not bill.
- Use this for lawful investigation, fraud prevention, due diligence and security research only.
Free-plan limits
Users without a paid Apify plan receive at most ten channel rows across the
entire run. The per-address limit is also bounded for those runs, including
when the requested value is zero. The complete analysis remains available in
FULL_RESULTS. Paid users retain the requested limit and can use zero for
unlimited channel rows per address.
FAQ
Is this email OSINT lookup visible to the person being investigated?
No. No email is sent to the address, no account is created and no password reset is triggered. Checks that would require that are left unresolved.
How many addresses can I look up per run?
Up to five. Start several runs, or call the actor from the API in a loop, for longer lists.
What happens when no accounts are found?
The address produces no dataset rows and no found-source charges. Its completed
analysis remains in FULL_RESULTS, and NO_RESULTS.addresses lists it.
Does unknown mean that no account exists?
No. It means the check did not produce a definitive answer. Unknown checks remain separate from positive and negative verdicts and are never billed.
Does limiting rows remove the full analysis?
No. The per-address channel limit applies to dataset rows. FULL_RESULTS
retains the complete analysis, public identity, breach metadata and unresolved
checks. Rows with a name or profile URL are preferred when the limit applies.