StayMatch: Three-Way Rooming List Reconciliation avatar

StayMatch: Three-Way Rooming List Reconciliation

Pricing

$0.50 / completed product packet

Go to Apify Store
StayMatch: Three-Way Rooming List Reconciliation

StayMatch: Three-Way Rooming List Reconciliation

Compare baseline, master and hotel rooming lists by reservation ID. Download proposed changes, reversible patches and unresolved conflicts. No bookings or hotel-system writes.

Pricing

$0.50 / completed product packet

Rating

0.0

(0)

Developer

US Tech Automations

US Tech Automations

Maintained by Community

Actor stats

0

Bookmarked

2

Total users

1

Monthly active users

14 hours ago

Last modified

Categories

Share

StayMatch

Turn three rooming-list snapshots into reviewable changes, reversible patches and a conflict list.

Named buyer

A hotel reservations or group-housing coordinator who must merge three rooming-list snapshots — contract baseline, internal master, and hotel — using exact reservation IDs.

This is not a property-management system. It does not talk to a hotel, book rooms, move guests, or settle contracts.

What it does

It compares the same reservation ID across baseline, master, and hotel. Where two sides changed away from the third and disagree, the row is unresolved: the master record is left unchanged and a conflict is listed. You may supply resolutions that pick baseline, master, or hotel for a cell (arrival, departure, room_type, room_unit) or __record__ for add/delete.

PASS means the merge packet was checked (including reversible patches). It does not mean every reservation is reconciled. Unresolved conflicts mean manual review.

Hotel room types are renamed only through the explicit hotel_room_type_map you provide.

Exact limits (from the engine)

  • At most 500 reservations in each snapshot (baseline, master, hotel)
  • 1–100 hotel_room_type_map entries (identity mappings allowed)
  • At most 1,500 resolution entries
  • At least one snapshot must contain a reservation; empty lists are allowed
  • IDs and room types: printable strings, 1–64 characters
  • Dates: YYYY-MM-DD; stay length 1–365 nights; arrival inclusive, departure exclusive
  • Optional room_unit; overlap checks run only when a unit id is supplied
  • JSON input cap at the adapter: 1 MiB
  • Unknown fields and non-finite numbers are refused

Input JSON example

This is the native sample (example.json). Paste this object into the payload JSON field.

{
"synthetic": true,
"baseline": [
{"id": "RES-101", "arrival": "2026-11-01", "departure": "2026-11-04", "room_type": "KING", "room_unit": "ROOM-1"},
{"id": "RES-102", "arrival": "2026-11-01", "departure": "2026-11-03", "room_type": "TWIN", "room_unit": "ROOM-2"},
{"id": "RES-103", "arrival": "2026-11-02", "departure": "2026-11-04", "room_type": "KING", "room_unit": "ROOM-3"}
],
"master": [
{"id": "RES-101", "arrival": "2026-11-01", "departure": "2026-11-05", "room_type": "KING", "room_unit": "ROOM-1"},
{"id": "RES-102", "arrival": "2026-11-02", "departure": "2026-11-03", "room_type": "TWIN", "room_unit": "ROOM-2"},
{"id": "RES-103", "arrival": "2026-11-02", "departure": "2026-11-04", "room_type": "KING", "room_unit": "ROOM-3"}
],
"hotel": [
{"id": "RES-101", "arrival": "2026-11-01", "departure": "2026-11-04", "room_type": "K", "room_unit": "ROOM-1"},
{"id": "RES-102", "arrival": "2026-10-31", "departure": "2026-11-03", "room_type": "T", "room_unit": "ROOM-2"},
{"id": "RES-104", "arrival": "2026-11-06", "departure": "2026-11-08", "room_type": "K", "room_unit": "ROOM-4"}
],
"hotel_room_type_map": {"K": "KING", "T": "TWIN"},
"resolutions": {}
}

On this sample the engine reports 1 unresolved conflict (RES-102 arrival: master and hotel both moved, and they disagree). RES-102 stays as the master row. RES-103 is removed in the proposed master (hotel dropped it, master matched baseline). RES-104 is added. A person still has to review the arrival conflict.

Public Apify input schema (input_schema.json) wraps that object as payload with a JSON editor. example and default are this sample. Extra fields are not documented and the engine rejects them.

Exact artifacts

The adapter returns status='PASS', the engine summary object, files (JSON/CSV/README bytes unchanged; HTML is the branded report), and archive (a zip of those files only).

Zip members:

FileContents
merge.jsonFull merge evidence (entries, conflicts, patches, reverse patches, merged master, input SHA-256)
merged_master.csvid, arrival, departure, room_type, room_unit, nights
patch.csvid, before_json, after_json
README.txtLimits, algorithm id, input hash, unresolved count, limitations
report.htmlBranded merge report (conflicts, master, patches, USTA shell)
styles.cssShared USTA stylesheet used by the report

Apply a patch only if the normalized current record equals its before value. Reverse patches restore the original normalized master. Normalize omitted room_unit to null before comparing.

What unresolved means

Unresolved records remain unchanged in master and receive no patch. That is a queue for manual review. The tool will not pick a winner, auto-book, or write back to a hotel.

Claims this product does not make

  • No hotel / PMS integration
  • No auto-booking or guest-name matching (exact opaque IDs only)
  • No contract, attrition, commission, billing, or payment conclusions
  • Room type alone does not prove occupancy; overlap checks need room_unit

Hosting

When you run this Actor, the payload is sent to Apify. It is not local-only. You control how long Apify keeps the run. US Tech Automations does not offer a lasting availability promise (no SLA) for Apify uptime.

Run and download

  1. Review the supported input and try the included synthetic example. Replace payload with your authorized records. For API runs, send an object with a single payload field containing that input.
  2. Run the Actor. Open Status and coverage to inspect the result.
  3. For a completed result, open Download completed ZIP or the artifact link in the dataset. Save and extract the ZIP before Apify retention expires. Open the HTML report where provided; retain the JSON and CSV evidence.

Price and unsuccessful runs

$0.50 per completed packet, with one packet per run and no start fee. A retry of the same run reuses the packet and the same billing identity. Starting a separate run is a separate request. Invalid input or an incomplete UNKNOWN result produces a diagnostic without a completed-packet charge. A completed conflict or shortage report can still require manual review; PASS does not mean every business problem was resolved.

The minimum run budget is $0.50. The example is a normal run and follows the same price; it is not a free preview promise. Apify handles account billing. These files are not permanent storage: download them promptly.

Access and support

Your input and output are processed on Apify under the run owner's account. Use authorized data and opaque IDs; do not upload passwords or sensitive personal records. Treat artifact URLs as access-bearing links and share them only intentionally. The USTA report may fetch the Satoshi font; it does not upload your report. For a product issue, use this Actor's Issues tab with the run ID and a redacted example. Never post private input or access-bearing links in a public issue.