AI Brand Monitor: GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
Pricing
Pay per event
AI Brand Monitor: GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
Track how your brand appears in AI answers across ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude. Measure mention rate, share-of-voice vs competitors, ranking & cited sources — with multi-sample reliability. GEO / AEO visibility data for SEO agencies, brand & PR teams. Pay-as-you-go.
Pricing
Pay per event
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
Berkan Kaplan
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
7 hours ago
Last modified
Share
AI Brand Monitor — GEO / AI Search Visibility Tracker
Is your brand recommended by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude — or are your competitors?
Buyers no longer "Google it." They ask an AI. When someone asks "what's the best project management software?", the AI names a handful of brands — and if yours isn't one of them, you lost that customer before you ever saw them. This is the new SEO, and it's called GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) / AEO (Answer Engine Optimization).
This Actor measures, with statistical rigor, exactly how visible your brand is inside AI answers — and tells you what to do about it.
Why this tracker is different
Most AI-visibility tools ask each question once and report the result as if it were the truth. But AI answers are non-deterministic — ask the same question three times and you can get three different brand lists. A single-shot check is noise dressed up as data.
| Typical trackers | AI Brand Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Ask once per prompt | Ask N times, report a mention RATE + stability |
| Reliability | A coin-flip snapshot | Statistically grounded, repeatable score |
| Cited sources | Opaque redirect URLs / titles | Real publisher domains (g2.com, wrike.com…) |
| Actionability | "Improve your visibility" | Citation-gap list: the exact domains to earn citations on next |
| Sentiment | Sometimes | Positive / neutral / critical, on the brand's actual context |
We ran the same prompt 3× during testing and watched the mention rate move between runs. That variance is real — and it's exactly why one-shot tools mislead. We report the rate and the stability, so you know how much to trust each number.
What you get
For a brand + category (and optional competitors), the Actor sends realistic buyer-intent prompts to AI engines with live web search enabled, samples each prompt multiple times, and returns:
Per prompt (one row each):
- Mention rate % — in how many samples your brand appeared
- Stability % — how consistent that outcome was across samples
- Average rank — where your brand lands among the brands the AI lists
- Sentiment — how the AI describes your brand (positive / neutral / critical)
- Competitors mentioned — who you're up against in that answer
- Cited sources — the real domains the AI grounded its answer on
- Answer excerpt — the raw AI response, for evidence
Summary scorecard (one row):
- AI Visibility Index (0–100) — one headline score (mention rate 50% + rank 30% + citation rate 20%), with a band: strong (70+) / mid-tier / visibility gap
- Trend — Δ vs. your previous run for the same brand, so scheduled runs show whether you're gaining or losing ground
- AI visibility % — overall mention rate across all samples and engines
- Share of voice % — your mentions vs. each competitor
- Overall sentiment + breakdown
- Citation rate — how often AI engines cite your own domain as a source (add your
brandDomain) - Top cited sources — the domains shaping answers in your category
- Citation gap — domains that ground competitor-only answers where you're absent. This is your GEO to-do list: earn a presence on these and you move the needle.
Built for automation & AI agents
- Webhooks / alerts — set a
webhookUrland we POST the full scorecard to Slack, Make, Zapier or n8n the moment a run finishes. - Schedule it — pair with Apify Scheduler for weekly tracking; the trend delta does the rest.
- Agent-friendly inputs — accepts the field names AI agents use interchangeably (
brand/brandName/company,competitors/rivals,engines/llms,prompts/questions).
Use it as an MCP tool (inside any AI agent — no install)
Call this Actor directly from Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT agents, LangChain, Make, Zapier or n8n via the Model Context Protocol:
Hosted (zero setup) — point your MCP client at:
https://mcp.apify.com?tools=foxlabs/ai-brand-monitor
Self-hosted (stdio clients — Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Continue):
$npx @apify/actors-mcp-server --tools foxlabs/ai-brand-monitor
{"mcpServers": {"ai-brand-monitor": {"command": "npx","args": ["-y", "@apify/actors-mcp-server", "--tools", "foxlabs/ai-brand-monitor"],"env": { "APIFY_TOKEN": "YOUR_APIFY_TOKEN" }}}}
Your agent can then ask "How visible is Notion in AI search?" and get the scorecard back inline.
Quick start
- Enter your brand (e.g.
Notion) and category (e.g.project management software). - (Optional) Add competitors to benchmark against.
- Run it.
That's it — no API keys, no setup. Sensible defaults are pre-filled.
{"brand": "Notion","category": "project management software","competitors": ["Asana", "Trello", "ClickUp", "Monday.com"],"engines": ["gemini", "openai", "anthropic"],"maxPromptsPerEngine": 5,"samplesPerPrompt": 3}
Engines
| Engine | Status |
|---|---|
| Gemini (Google) — live Google Search grounding | ✅ Supported out of the box, no setup |
| ChatGPT (OpenAI) — live web search | ✅ Supported out of the box, no setup |
| Claude (Anthropic) — live web search | ✅ Supported out of the box, no setup |
| Perplexity | 🔑 Bring your own API key |
Three engines run with zero setup — Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude, each with real-time web search enabled. To also query Perplexity, paste your own Perplexity API key in the Advanced inputs; it runs on your account.
Engines disagree more than you'd think. In our own testing, Gemini and ChatGPT both recommended Notion for "project management software" — but Claude didn't mention it at all. Tracking multiple engines is the whole point: your visibility isn't one number, it's different on every surface.
Input reference
| Field | What it does |
|---|---|
brand | The brand to track in AI answers |
category | Product category — used to auto-generate realistic buyer prompts |
competitors | Brands to benchmark share-of-voice against |
engines | Which AI engines to query (Gemini supported by default) |
maxPromptsPerEngine | How many buyer-intent prompts (1–25). More = broader coverage |
samplesPerPrompt | How many times to repeat each prompt (1–5). More = more reliable |
prompts | (Advanced) Your own exact prompts, overriding auto-generation |
*ApiKey | (Advanced) Bring your own key per engine |
How it works (transparent by design)
- Prompt generation — realistic buyer-intent questions are built from your category (or you supply your own).
- Multi-sample querying — each prompt is sent to each engine
samplesPerPrompttimes, with live web search on. - Deterministic analysis — brand and competitor mentions are detected by exact token matching (no fuzzy guessing); rank is the order brands appear in; sentiment is classified from the sentences that mention your brand.
- Aggregation — mention rate, stability, share-of-voice, sentiment, cited sources and the citation gap are computed across all samples.
No scraping, no cookie tricks — only official AI provider APIs.
A note on sentiment (v1): sentiment is classified with a transparent, deterministic keyword model over the brand's mention context. It's a fast, explainable signal — not a black-box LLM judgment.
Who it's for
- SEO / GEO agencies — sell evidence-backed AI-visibility reports to clients (recurring).
- Brand & marketing teams — track your standing vs. competitors over time.
- Founders — find out, today, whether AI is recommending you or your rivals.
Schedule it weekly to watch your AI visibility trend — because the answers change, and so should your strategy.
Built by foXLabs.
