Influencer Audit – Fake Followers & Brand Safety
Pricing
$0.05 / creator audit
Influencer Audit – Fake Followers & Brand Safety
Vet any YouTube creator before you pay for a sponsorship. One-click audit: engagement quality, suspected fake/inflated subscribers, view consistency, brand-safety scan (adult, hate, violence, gambling, scam) and a creator score with a GOOD FIT / CAUTION / AVOID verdict. No API key.
Pricing
$0.05 / creator audit
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
Logiover
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
4 hours ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
🕵️ Influencer Audit – Fake Followers & Brand Safety Check
Vet any YouTube creator BEFORE you pay for a sponsorship. Paste a channel → one-click audit: engagement quality, suspected fake / inflated subscribers, view consistency, a brand-safety scan, and a clear GOOD FIT / CAUTION / AVOID verdict. No API key, no login.
This Actor is an influencer audit, fake-follower checker, YouTube engagement checker, and brand-safety screener in one. It's built for brands, agencies, and creator-marketing teams who refuse to burn budget on a creator with bought subscribers or unsafe content.
Need to check an influencer before sponsoring, detect fake YouTube subscribers, calculate a creator's engagement rate, audit audience quality, or run a brand-safety check on a channel? Drop the channels in and export clean JSON / CSV / Excel.
✅ What each audit includes
Verdict & scores
verdict— GOOD FIT / CAUTION / AVOIDcreatorScore(0–100) blending engagement health, authenticity & brand safetybrandSafetyScore(0–100)
Authenticity
- Subscribers vs real average views (true engagement rate)
- View consistency (catches spiky / bought views)
- Suspected inflated-subscriber flag, channel activity/inactivity, channel size
Brand safety
- Scans recent video titles + descriptions for unsafe categories: adult, hate, violence, drugs, gambling, scam, profanity
- Lists the exact
flaggedCategoriesandflaggedTerms
Fit & outreach
- Topics / keywords, country, and contact email (when public)
🎯 Best for
- Brands & DTC marketers — qualify creators before sending product or money
- Influencer-marketing agencies — bulk-screen creator rosters and shortlists
- Sponsorship / UGC teams — avoid brand-safety incidents and wasted spend
- Talent managers & MCNs — benchmark a roster's engagement health
- Affiliate / ambassador programs — vet applicants at scale
- Due diligence — one bad creator deal costs far more than the audit
⚡ Why this one
- One-click, key-free — paste a channel, get the audit. No login, no cookie, no API token.
- Decision-ready — a single verdict + score, not raw stats you have to interpret.
- Transparent — every authenticity flag and unsafe term is shown, so you see why.
- Real engagement, not vanity — measures views vs subscribers, not just follower count.
- Bulk + API — screen a whole roster per run; export or pull via the Apify API.
🛠 How to use
- Add YouTube channels (@handles, IDs, or URLs).
- Set Recent videos to analyze (more = steadier signal).
- Run and read the verdict + flags, or export the dataset.
Example input
{ "channels": ["@mkbhd", "@MrBeast"], "recentVideosToAnalyze": 15 }
📤 Output
{"channelTitle": "Marques Brownlee","handle": "@mkbhd","verdict": "GOOD FIT","creatorScore": 100,"brandSafetyScore": 100,"flaggedCategories": [],"authenticityFlags": [],"subscriberCount": 21000000,"avgRecentViews": 3691667,"engagementRatePct": 17.58,"viewConsistencyCV": 0.42,"contactEmail": "business@mkbhd.com","country": "US"}
🧠 How the verdict works
- Engagement health — real average views ÷ subscribers. Big follower counts with tiny, erratic views = a classic bought-audience signal.
- Consistency — wildly swinging view counts suggest view-buying or one-off virality, not a reliable audience.
- Brand safety — recent titles/descriptions matched against unsafe-content lexicons; each hit lowers the safety score.
- Final verdict — GOOD FIT (clean, healthy), CAUTION (some flags / unsafe categories), AVOID (low score or unsafe).
🆚 How it compares
vs. follower-count tools — follower count is the easiest metric to fake. This measures real engagement and consistency instead.
vs. manual vetting — scrolling a channel for red flags doesn't scale and misses patterns. This audits a roster in one run with a repeatable score.
vs. expensive influencer platforms — same core vetting (engagement quality + brand safety) on pay-per-result Apify pricing, no seat fees, with API access.
❓ FAQ
How does it detect fake / inflated subscribers? It compares subscriber count to real recent view performance and view consistency. A huge subscriber count with low, erratic views gets flagged as possible inflation.
What does the brand-safety scan check? Recent video titles and the channel description against unsafe-content categories (adult, hate, violence, drugs, gambling, scam, profanity). Flagged categories and terms are listed for your team to review.
Does it need any keys or login? No — it reads public YouTube data only.
Can I audit a whole roster at once? Yes — pass many channels and screen them in a single run, or pull results via the API.
Which platforms? YouTube (the highest-signal, key-free source for true engagement data).
💰 Pricing
Pay-per-result: charged per creator audit. No subscription.
Keywords
influencer audit, fake follower checker, fake subscriber detector, youtube engagement checker, engagement rate calculator youtube, brand safety check, influencer vetting tool, creator due diligence, sponsorship audit, influencer fraud detection, audience quality check, creator brand safety, vet influencer before sponsoring, youtube channel audit, influencer marketing tool, check youtube creator, bought followers detection.