Google Images Scraper - Source Pages & Prices
Pricing
from $0.72 / 1,000 image returneds
Google Images Scraper - Source Pages & Prices
[$0.90 / 1K images] Scrape Google Images with the source page and its title, the domain, file size, dominant colour and exact dimensions - plus price, rating and brand on shopping results. Full filter set. No start fee.
Pricing
from $0.72 / 1,000 image returneds
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
WebData Labs
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
3 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Google Images Scraper
Scrape Google Images into structured rows. Every image comes back with its full-resolution URL, its exact dimensions, the page it appears on and that page's title, the domain, the file size Google measured, and the image's dominant colour. Where Google recognises the image as a product, the row also carries the price, the list price, the star rating, the review count and the brand.
✅ What you get
- The source page, not just the image. Page URL, page title, site name and domain on every row.
- File size and dominant colour —
fileSizeas Google reports it (14KB,1.2MB),dominantColoras anrgb()triple. - Product data on shopping images. Price, list price, currency, star rating, review count, brand, description and the Google Shopping link.
- Exact dimensions for both the full image and the thumbnail.
- A provenance link (
aboutThisImageUrl) to Google's "About this image" page. - Google's own filters: size, colour, type, file type, usage rights, recency, SafeSearch, single-domain, and 18 languages × 20 countries — each one checked against a live baseline, not assumed.
- A working aspect-ratio filter, applied here rather than by Google (see the limits below).
- Partial-failure rows, so one blocked search does not destroy a bulk run.
❌ What this isn't
This is not a reverse image search, an image downloader, or Google Lens. It does not fetch the image files themselves — it returns the URLs and the metadata around them.
🔎 Example tasks
👥 Who it is for
SEO and content teams auditing which pages rank in image search; e-commerce teams watching how their products appear next to competitors'; designers and researchers building filtered image sets; anyone assembling a training or reference set who needs attribution, not just pixels.
⚙️ Input
Give it queries (one search term per line), or paste searchUrls straight from Google Images — a pasted URL keeps whatever filters you already set there. Everything else is optional: size, colour, type, aspect ratio, file type, usage rights, published-within, a single domain, SafeSearch, language and country. The prefilled input is a complete one-search run.
📤 Output
One row per image:
| Field | Example |
|---|---|
imageUrl, imageWidth, imageHeight | https://…/shoe.jpg, 1872, 2340 |
thumbnailUrl, thumbnailWidth, thumbnailHeight | https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/…, 225, 225 |
fileSize | 14KB |
dominantColor | rgb(42,48,48) |
sourcePageUrl, sourcePageTitle | the page the image is published on, and its <title> |
sourceDomain, siteName | www.adidas.com, Adidas |
aboutThisImageUrl | Google's provenance page for the image |
isProduct | true on shopping results |
productTitle, productBrand, productPrice, productListPrice, productCurrency | 199.99, was 300, USD |
productRating, productReviewCount, productDescription | 4.59, 81 |
googleShoppingUrl | the product's Google Shopping page |
query, searchUrl, position, scrapedAt | provenance for the row itself |
💵 Pricing
Pay per image returned. No start fee, no charge for a search that comes back empty.
⚠️ Honest limits
- 100 images per search is Google's ceiling, not ours. There is no page two on Google Images:
&start=100answers200with an empty result set. To go wider on one topic, run the same term under different filters (size, colour, recency) — each combination returns a different 100. - Product data covers roughly one row in eight. That is the share Google itself tags as shopping results; the rest are ordinary web images and their commerce columns are left empty rather than guessed.
- Google ignores its own aspect-ratio filter on image search, so this Actor applies it. In a controlled run, asking Google for tall images returned 98 of the same 100 images as the unfiltered search and only 22 of them were actually portrait. Every row carries exact dimensions, so the filter is applied to the results instead — which means a narrow shape returns fewer than 100 rows, and you are only charged for the rows you get. Every other filter was confirmed to bite against the same baseline.
- "Exactly WxH" is roughly four rows in five. Google fills the remainder with near matches; the dimensions on each row tell you which is which.
usageRightsreports what Google reports. It reflects what the source site claims, it is not legal advice, and you should check the licence on the source page before reusing an image.- Results are personalised by locale. The same query under a different
countryorlanguagereturns a different set, and product prices follow the country you choose. - A blocked search fails loudly. A run where no search returned any image ends as FAILED rather than shipping an empty dataset as a success.